Questioner: I think the problem is deeper. What you know, what you are aware of, that is your conscious; everything you are not aware of, don’t know about, that is your unconscious. KRISHNAMURTI: I understand; that is what he said just now. Please give a few minutes thought to what somebody else has said, which is: if I don’t know the content of my superficial consciousness, can that consciousness, which is not complete in the understanding of its superficiality, examine the unconscious? That is what you are doing now, aren’t you? You are trying to observe the unconscious consciously. No?
He's Ignoring the questioner's correct assertion to continue with his fallacious b.s. Basing it on the lie that the consciousness can in any way be unknown
