might choose to die for it. But what could be more hallowed than the life of the individual? The life of the all, or one’s own all, one might surmise, this being the legitimization of the majority of wars. Nonetheless, it is an abstraction, and must surely mean nothing in the instant of rising to one’s feet to charge forward into a hail of bullets.
Ok. So is his whole thing railing against H’s eradication of the =I= or the individual? So he wrote this whole thing to show how significant one life is? No way
