Fear: Trump in the White House
Rate it:
Open Preview
Kindle Notes & Highlights
Read between June 25 - July 15, 2019
1%
Flag icon
Resolute Desk
1%
Flag icon
Special Access Programs (SAP),
1%
Flag icon
Despite almost daily reports of chaos and discord in the White House, the public did not know how bad the internal situation actually was. Trump was always shifting, rarely fixed, erratic. He would get in a bad mood, something large or small would infuriate him, and he would say about the KORUS trade agreement, “We’re withdrawing today.”
1%
Flag icon
Staff secretary is one of the low-profile but critical roles in any White House. For months, Porter had been briefing Trump on decision memos and other presidential documents, including the most sensitive national security authorizations for military and covert CIA activities.
1%
Flag icon
In addition to coordinating policy decisions and schedules and running the paperwork for the president, Porter told an associate, “A third of my job was trying to react to some of the really dangerous ideas that he had and try to give him reasons to believe that maybe they weren’t such good ideas.”
1%
Flag icon
The reality was that the United States in 2017 was tethered to the words and actions of an emotionally overwrought, mercurial and unpredictable leader. Members of his staff had joined to purposefully block some of what they believed were the president’s most dangerous impulses. It was a nervous breakdown of the executive power of the most powerful country in the world.
2%
Flag icon
Populism was a grassroots movement to disrupt the political status quo in favor of everyday people.
3%
Flag icon
The first act of the Bannon drama is his appearance—the old military field jacket over multiple tennis polo shirts. The second act is his demeanor—aggressive, certain and loud.
3%
Flag icon
Trump had won the Republican nomination over 16 others and was a big, profane, subversive presence, out front seizing the nation’s attention.
3%
Flag icon
Rebekah Mercer.
3%
Flag icon
Reince Priebus,
3%
Flag icon
Trump would not tone it down, and he attacked anyone who attacked him.
3%
Flag icon
There was only one path forward: escalation on all fronts. Maximize aggression to conceal vital weakness.
4%
Flag icon
It was one of Trump’s paradoxes: He attacked the mainstream media with relish, especially the Times—but despite the full-takedown language, he considered the Times the paper of record and largely believed its stories.
4%
Flag icon
change agent.
4%
Flag icon
“Number one,” Bannon went on, “we’re going to stop mass illegal immigration and start to limit legal immigration to get our sovereignty back. Number two, you are going to bring manufacturing jobs back to the country. And number three, we’re going to get out of these pointless foreign wars.”
4%
Flag icon
neoconservative.
4%
Flag icon
“Tell them I’m not going to pay.” It was a standard line.
5%
Flag icon
analytics and big data,
6%
Flag icon
Tiberius Gracchus”—the
6%
Flag icon
intelligence was increasingly another political football to kick around.
10%
Flag icon
Bedminster,
12%
Flag icon
management failures.
13%
Flag icon
“This is a political witch hunt.”
13%
Flag icon
Hope Hicks,
13%
Flag icon
“oppositional defiance syndrome,”
14%
Flag icon
Facts and Fears,
14%
Flag icon
A Higher Loyalty,
15%
Flag icon
Ambassador Sergey Kislyak,
16%
Flag icon
Dereliction of Duty: Lyndon Johnson, Robert McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Lies That Led to Vietnam.
17%
Flag icon
The Hermit Kingdom
18%
Flag icon
“War promises human tragedy,” and “War at some level is an expression of human folly.”
20%
Flag icon
Harvey argued there was potential for a catastrophic war, with immense humanitarian, economic and strategic consequences. An Iranian-Israeli conflict would draw in the United States and unhinge efforts to bring regional stability.
20%
Flag icon
PDB briefings.
21%
Flag icon
The Saudis and Israelis, both longtime foes of Iran, had both open and important backchannel relations.
22%
Flag icon
Lujan, a holdover from the Obama administration, knew the Afghanistan policy under Obama had been simple in practice: Avoid catastrophe.
22%
Flag icon
Initially, in meetings with representatives from the Pentagon, State Department and the intelligence agencies, McMaster laid out his four frames or goals: 1. Achieve political stability that will include a political settlement with the insurgent Taliban. 2. Push for institutional actions by the Afghan government to counter the Taliban. 3. Increase pressure on neighboring Pakistan, which was playing a double game—nominally allied with the United States, but also supporting terrorists and the Taliban. 4. Maintain international support from the 39 countries allied with the United States in a ...more
22%
Flag icon
There were four missions in Afghanistan: train and advise the Afghan Army and police; logistical support; counterterrorism; and the intelligence mission.
22%
Flag icon
R4s: reinforce, realign, reconcile and regionalize.
23%
Flag icon
Counterterrorism Pursuit Teams,
28%
Flag icon
David Ignatius,
29%
Flag icon
if the paper was not sitting in front of him, he’d likely forget it. If it was out of sight, it was out of mind.
31%
Flag icon
Dowd discussed the known facts with Trump’s legal advisers and reviewed the material for possible vulnerabilities. Based on a preliminary review of the known evidence, he did not see anything to support a charge of collusion with the Russians or obstruction of justice.
32%
Flag icon
Trump rarely missed a chance to declare that it was unfair and a “witch hunt.”
32%
Flag icon
Real power is fear. It’s all about strength. Never show weakness. You’ve always got to be strong. Don’t be bullied. There is no choice.
32%
Flag icon
“You’ve got to deny, deny, deny and push back on these women,” he said. “If you admit to anything and any culpability, then you’re dead. That was a big mistake you made. You didn’t come out guns blazing and just challenge them. You showed weakness. You’ve got to be strong. You’ve got to be aggressive. You’ve got to push back hard. You’ve got to deny anything that’s said about you. Never admit.”
32%
Flag icon
Porter observed that anytime anybody challenged Trump—in a policy debate, in court, in the public square—his natural instinct seemed to be that if he was not exerting strength, he was failing.
33%
Flag icon
leader-command-and-control targeting
33%
Flag icon
Desert Fox
33%
Flag icon
Dora Farm,
« Prev 1