The Supreme Court didn’t see it that way. The majority of justices had imbibed the tonic of voter fraud and saw before them the hallucination of ne’er-do-wells in the cities stealing elections and undermining democracy. The court recognized, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote, that the “only kind of voter fraud that SEA 483 addresses is in-person voter impersonation at polling places.” And, he was forced to admit, that the “record contains no evidence of any such fraud actually occurring in Indiana at any time in its history.” That easily should have been the end of it. But it wasn’t. Instead, he
...more

