I just think something is more likely. After all, nothing is very special. If you have a number line, “zero” is just one infinitesimal point among the infinity of possible numbers you can choose. “Nothing” is so special that without an underlying reason, you wouldn’t expect it to characterize the state of the Universe. But even an underlying reason is something. You at least need physical laws to explain a very nonrandom occurrence.
Meh. There are far more describable concepts that have no objects that match that description than there are objects.
For instance: 80 foot tall pink bunnies -- none, nada, zilch.
