Christopher

41%
Flag icon
Of course, statisticians already knew of one excellent way to establish causation in a more general sense: the randomized controlled trial (RCT). But such a study would be neither feasible nor ethical in the case of smoking. How could you assign people chosen at random to smoke for decades, possibly ruining their health, just to see if they would get lung cancer after thirty years? It’s impossible to imagine anyone outside North Korea “volunteering” for such a study.
The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect (Penguin Science)
Rate this book
Clear rating