Unlike the implosion of ABCP, the “run on repo” was a surprise.14 Under British and American law, the holder of repo collateral is entitled to seize it ahead of any other claimant in the bankruptcy queue. So even allowing for Bear’s large portfolio of toxic mortgage-backed securities, its repo ought to have been good. A Treasury security is a Treasury security. Unfortunately for Bear, given that there were plenty of other counterparties to engage in repo trades with, no one wanted to take the risk of having to seize collateral from a failing bank, even if the collateral was as highly rated and
...more