The Hidden Reality: Parallel Universes and the Deep Laws of the Cosmos
Rate it:
0%
Flag icon
Copyright © 2011 Brian Greene
0%
Flag icon
eISBN: 978-0-307-59525-6
0%
Flag icon
Preface
1%
Flag icon
CHAPTER 1
1%
Flag icon
The Bounds of Reality
1%
Flag icon
On Parallel Worlds
1%
Flag icon
This book is an exploration of such possibilities, a considered journey through the science of parallel universes.
1%
Flag icon
Universe and Universes
2%
Flag icon
Varieties of Parallel Universes
2%
Flag icon
After decades of closely studying quantum mechanics, and after having accumulated a wealth of data confirming its probabilistic predictions, no one has been able to explain why only one of the many possible outcomes in any given situation actually happens. When we do experiments, when we examine the world, we all agree that we encounter a single definite reality. Yet, more than a century after the quantum revolution began, there is no consensus among the world’s physicists as to how this basic fact is compatible with the theory’s mathematical expression.
2%
Flag icon
The mathematics underlying quantum mechanics—or at least, one perspective on the math—suggests that all possible outcomes happen, each inhabiting its own separate universe.
3%
Flag icon
The Cosmic Order
3%
Flag icon
The subject of parallel universes is highly speculative. No experiment or observation has established that any version of the idea is realized in nature. So my point in writing this book is not to convince you that we’re part of a multiverse. I’m not convinced—and, speaking generally, no one should be convinced—of anything not supported by hard data.
3%
Flag icon
My intention, then, is to lay out clearly and concisely the intellectual steps and the chain of theoretical insights that have led physicists, from a range of perspectives, to consider the possibility that ours is one of many universes. I want you to get a sense of how modern scientific investigations—not untethered fantasies like the catoptric musings of my boyhood—naturally suggest this astounding possibility.
3%
Flag icon
For me, it is the depth of our understanding, acquired from our lonely vantage point in the inky black stillness of a cold and forbidding cosmos, that reverberates across the expanse of reality and marks our arrival.
3%
Flag icon
CHAPTER 2
3%
Flag icon
Endless Doppelgängers
3%
Flag icon
The Quilted Multiverse
3%
Flag icon
But even without the capacity to observe these realms, we’ll see that basic physical principles establish that if the cosmos is infinitely large, it is home to infinitely many parallel worlds—some identical to ours, some differing from ours, many bearing no resemblance to our world at all.
3%
Flag icon
The Father of the Big Bang
4%
Flag icon
General Relativity
4%
Flag icon
There’s no rope tethering them together, no chain tugging the earth as it moves, so how does gravity exert its influence? In his Principia, published in 1687, Newton recognized the importance of this question but acknowledged that his own law was disturbingly silent about the answer.
4%
Flag icon
(Einstein contended that warps in space and time don’t need a facilitator since they are gravity);
4%
Flag icon
The Universe and the Teapot
4%
Flag icon
The cosmological principle asserts that if the universe is examined on the largest of scales, it will appear uniform.
5%
Flag icon
In the years since, astronomical observations have provided substantial support for the cosmological principle, but only if you examine space on scales at least 100 million light-years across (which is about a thousand times the end-to-end length of the Milky Way). If you take a box that’s a hundred million light-years on each side and plunk it down here, take another such box and plunk it down way over there (say, a billion light-years from here), and then measure the average overall properties inside each box—average number of galaxies, average amount of matter, average temperature, and so ...more
5%
Flag icon
Einstein, who adhered to this cosmic perspective, found to his dismay that it was at odds with general relativity. The math showed that the density of matter and energy cannot be constant through time. Either the density grows or it diminishes, but it can’t stay put.
5%
Flag icon
Because there’s no outward force to cancel the attractive pull of gravity, general relativity shows that the universe can’t be static. Either the fabric of space stretches or it contracts, but its size can’t remain fixed.
5%
Flag icon
The eternal and static cosmos that Einstein expected would emerge from his equations was simply not there.
5%
Flag icon
Taxing Gravity
5%
Flag icon
When general relativity elevated space and time into dynamic participants in the unfolding of the cosmos, they shifted from merely providing language to delineate where and when things take place to being physical entities with their own intrinsic properties.
6%
Flag icon
If the universe had a cosmological constant of the right size—that is, if space were endowed with the right amount of intrinsic energy—his theory of gravity fell in line with the prevailing belief that the universe on the largest of scales was unchanging.
6%
Flag icon
The Primeval Atom
6%
Flag icon
In 1929, using what was then the world’s largest telescope at the Mount Wilson Observatory, the American astronomer Edwin Hubble gathered convincing evidence that the distant galaxies were all rushing away from the Milky Way. The remote photons that Hubble examined had traveled to earth with a clear message: The universe is not static. It is expanding.
6%
Flag icon
Lemaître and Friedmann were vindicated. Friedmann received credit for being the first to explore the expanding universe solutions, and Lemaître for independently developing them into robust cosmological scenarios.
6%
Flag icon
The Models and the Data
6%
Flag icon
The cosmological principle—the assumed homogeneity of the cosmos—constrains the geometry of space because most shapes are not sufficiently uniform to qualify: they bulge here, flatten out there, or twist way over there. But the cosmological principle does not imply a unique shape for our three dimensions of space; instead, it reduces the possibilities to a sharply culled collection of candidates.
6%
Flag icon
The uniformity of the cosmos articulated by the cosmological principle substantially winnows the possible shapes for the universe. Some of the possible shapes have infinite spatial extent, while others do not.
7%
Flag icon
Our Universe
7%
Flag icon
If there is a lot of matter, gravity will cause space to curve back on itself, yielding the spherical shape. If there is little matter, space is free to flare outward in the Pringles shape. And if there is just the right amount of matter, space will have zero curvature.*
7%
Flag icon
The mathematics shows that “just the right amount of matter,” the so-called critical density, weighs in today at about 2 × 10–29 grams per cubic centimeter, which is about six hydrogen atoms per cubic meter or, in more familiar terms, the equivalent of a single raindrop in every earth-sized volume.
7%
Flag icon
The question then is whether each cubic meter would weigh more or less than six hydrogen atoms.
7%
Flag icon
The result differs from what Einstein long ago proposed (since he posited a value that would yield a static universe, whereas our universe is expanding). That’s not surprising. Instead, what’s remarkable is that the measurements have concluded that the dark energy filling space contributes approximately 73 percent of the critical density. When added to the 27 percent of criticality astronomers had already measured, this brings the total right up to 100 percent of the critical density, just the right amount of matter and energy for a universe with zero spatial curvature.
7%
Flag icon
Reality in an Infinite Universe
7%
Flag icon
The closer to time zero you consider an infinite universe, the denser it becomes at every location, but its spatial extent remains unending.
8%
Flag icon
Infinite Space and the Patchwork Quilt
8%
Flag icon
Fifty-two cards can be arranged in different ways (52 possibilities for which card will be the first, times 51 remaining possibilities for which will be the second, times 50 remaining possibilities for the next card, and so on).
John Michael Strubhart
80 unvigintillion 658 vigintillion 175 novemdecillion 170 octodecillion 943 septendecillion 878 sexdecillion 571 quindecillion 660 quattuordecillion 636 tredecillion 856 duodecillion 403 undecillion 766 decillion 975 nonillion 289 octillion 505 septillion 440 sextillion 883 quintillion 277 quadrillion 824 trillion
8%
Flag icon
Finite Possibilities
9%
Flag icon
For instance, if the smallest increments that can be detected are a hundredth of a centimeter, then each centimeter offers not an infinite number of detectably different locations, but only a hundred. Each cubic centimeter would thus provide 1003 = 1,000,000 different locations, and your average bedroom would offer about 100 trillion. Whether the fly would find this array of options sufficiently impressive to keep away from your ear is difficult to say. The conclusion, though, is that anything but measurements with perfect resolution reduces the number of possibilities from infinite to finite.
9%
Flag icon
According to quantum mechanics, there’s a precise sense in which there is a fundamental limit on how accurate particular measurements can be, and this limit can’t ever be surpassed, regardless of technological progress—ever. The limit arises from a central feature of quantum mechanics, the uncertainty principle.
« Prev 1 3 8