To describe the access level that applies when none is specified, this book uses the traditional package-private instead of the technically correct package access [JLS, 6.6.1].
this is just what to call it when you don't specify access level? still don't understand why James didn't want to give an explicit name for that access level? guess i could go try and ask him... ;)
> still don't understand why James didn't want to give an explicit name for that access level? "package access" is the explicit name (defined in the JLS). Or do you mean in code? So there'd be no d…
> still don't understand why James didn't want to give an explicit name for that access level?
"package access" is the explicit name (defined in the JLS). Or do you mean in code? So there'd be no d…