These, then, are the tragedies of Modi. The first: that such a bargain had to be struck in the first place. In 2014, many voters were forced to conclude that a personally honest and economically reform-minded leader was the best that India could hope for, even if his election came with the risks of political schism. This choice was made because the desired alternative—a leader who was popular, honest, economically imaginative, but also statesmanlike, untainted by violence, and willing to place issues of identity and faith outside the public square—was now in India almost impossible to imagine.
...more

