Our dominant political narrative pits defenders of individual liberty—articulated
I object to the presumption that those aligned with the Market are *more* protective of individual liberty than those aligned with the State.
Yes, once the state has become oppressive, that seems axiomatic. But the market has quietly become just as oppressive, simultaneously.
If the author's thesis were examined fairly, he'd probably come to a different conclusion. But he's ideologically aligned, naively, with the [presumptively] non-coercive market.
