The Road Less Stupid: Advice from the Chairman of the Board
Rate it:
Open Preview
Read between September 18 - November 25, 2020
7%
Flag icon
The three most fundamental questions to ask to help get clarity about the root problem/obstacle are:
7%
Flag icon
What are the possible reasons I am noticin...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
7%
Flag icon
What isn’t happening that, if it did happen, would cause the perceived gap (symptoms) to ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
7%
Flag icon
What is happening that, if it stopped happening, would cause the perceived gap (symptom...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
7%
Flag icon
The machine we create and build should always help us overcome the obstacle that is blocking our forward progress and momentum, not just alleviate the pain of the symptom.
7%
Flag icon
Few things are worse than running the wrong direction enthusiastically. Misdiagnosing the problem or working on the wrong priorities results in a dumb tax!
7%
Flag icon
All those good ideas that turned out bad have one thing in common: unexamined assumptions, which usually take the form of a really great story.
8%
Flag icon
The key to checking assumptions is to look for where I have substituted an opinion for a fact.
8%
Flag icon
One of my most frequent Thinking Time questions is: “What Don’t I See?”
8%
Flag icon
What none of us see are the assumptions we make about the problem we have, the solution we create, or the opportunity in front of us.
8%
Flag icon
An assumption I used to make quite frequently was “lottery investing” (small investment, high probability of failure, but astronomical returns if lucky).
8%
Flag icon
“If I stood here and hit a thousand golf balls, the likelihood that any of them would go in the hole is very remote. Maybe if I hit 10,000 golf balls I might get lucky and one would go in; but, you are not offering 10,000 to 1 odds. I know it’s a small amount of money and that I could easily afford it, but it’s bad odds. Stupid in small things, stupid in big things.”
8%
Flag icon
spent some quality Thinking Time differentiating the facts from our emotions and fantasies.
8%
Flag icon
Core Discipline #4—Consider the 2nd-Order Consequences
8%
Flag icon
I use the following three questions (which I call the Power of 3) as one of my litmus tests to help me think before I act:
8%
Flag icon
What is the upside? We are usually experts at this one.
8%
Flag icon
What is the downside? What could go wrong? We rarely can do this one by ourselves because we are irrationally emotional and optimistic ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
8%
Flag icon
Can I live with the downside? Only the pros bother to think about this one, which is why their track record of dumb tax is so much smaller than th...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
9%
Flag icon
We only have a choice about the decision we are about to make, not the consequences. An important decision that does not identify the possible risks as well as the probability and costs of failure is a decision with a high likelihood of creating drama.
9%
Flag icon
The problem with drama is that it always costs money.
9%
Flag icon
Tom’s answer has stuck with me for over twenty-five years now. “No, a double bogey is a bad shot followed by a stupid shot.”
9%
Flag icon
Here it is on a bumper sticker: Thinking about 2nd-order consequences minimizes the probability of a double bogey. Mistakes are inevitable, but double bogeys are usually avoidable.
9%
Flag icon
Core Discipline #5—Create the Machine
9%
Flag icon
Here it is on a bumper sticker: Shoes that don’t fit are not a bargain at any price. A good idea that can’t be executed is a bad idea.
9%
Flag icon
Building an effective machine or adapting the current machine implies actual activity, and that activity will be different from what is currently being executed.
9%
Flag icon
Regardless of the change, management must shift priorities if the new solution has a shot at being effective.
10%
Flag icon
to operate them. When you stop to think about it, a great machine that is operated by a team of B and C players who execute inconsistently and are a poor cultural fit is a machine doomed to mediocrity or the dump.
10%
Flag icon
in “A CEO Should Never Delegate . . .”) Consistent execution requires dashboards, processes, best practices, standards, metrics, and accountability to measure the critical drivers, monitor the progress, reward the success, and coach/train the people operating
10%
Flag icon
Measurement is THE key to sustainability and a culture of accountability.
10%
Flag icon
One tiny mistake can derail the entire process. Finding the dash of paprika that is ruining your pie requires careful thinking and close observation.
10%
Flag icon
Thinking Time: The Process
10%
Flag icon
My Thinking Time is highly ritualized. I have a thinking chair. The only time I sit in it is during my Thinking Time sessions. I have a thinking pen and thinking journal: I use them only when I am in Thinking Time mode. And I follow this step-by-step process to structure each Thinking Time session:
10%
Flag icon
A great Thinking Time session requires a great question as the launching pad.
10%
Flag icon
I clear my calendar for sixty minutes, which will enable me to think for about three-quarters of an hour and then evaluate/sort the solutions
11%
Flag icon
For most of my questions, one Thinking Time session is insufficient, but focusing for more than about forty minutes is the limit of my capacity to concentrate.
11%
Flag icon
(I am old-school, so I always think on paper and never the computer, where too many distractions and temptations pop up.)
11%
Flag icon
Right before I start, I sip my water, scratch what itches, go to the bathroom, clear my throat, and then sit perfectly still.
11%
Flag icon
To optimize the thinking process, I must lose touch with my body so that my train of concentration is totally uninterrupted.
11%
Flag icon
Capturing my Thinking Time ideas while they are fresh is critical to this process.
11%
Flag icon
If any of these ideas are worthy of future consideration or possible action, then I schedule additional Thinking Time on my calendar.
11%
Flag icon
If I don’t take the step of scheduling it on the calendar, it stays on my “To Do” list and never gets implemented or addressed.
11%
Flag icon
It is rare for me to have fewer than two or more than three Thinking Time Sessions in a week.
12%
Flag icon
What we refer to as conventional wisdom rarely passes the sniff test of common sense.
12%
Flag icon
If you drank the Kool-Aid of one of these “how to get your mind right and passively become a millionaire in thirty days with no money down by working four hours per week from your kitchen table in your bathrobe” best sellers, chances are you are in worse financial shape now than when you started.
12%
Flag icon
vast majority of these financial self-help gurus who promise millionaire, even billionaire, status owe their financial success to selling the Kool-Aid, not from drinking it themselves.
12%
Flag icon
Yet, when you think about someone you admire, someone who has achieved the success or greatness you aspire to, you will inevitably find years of practice, hard work, patience, persistence, correction, more practice, and more corrections.
12%
Flag icon
You will also find a teacher, coach, or mentor who illuminates the way so you do not have to make all the stupid and obvious mistakes yourself.
12%
Flag icon
When we really take a hard look at the people we want to emulate, we will inevitably find that they all started at the back of the line.
12%
Flag icon
They practiced for countless hours, stayed in line, followed the advice of a great coach or mentor, overcame numerous obstacles, had some lucky breaks, committed to being a learner, practiced countless more hours, and eventually got to the front of the line.
12%
Flag icon
Here is an important point: Their success was not obvious at the begin...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.