Suppose, then, that in 1945 we had valued the human life of farms and farm communities 1 percent more than we valued ‘economic growth’ and technological progress. And suppose we had espoused the health of homes, farms, towns, and cities with anything like the resolve and energy with which we built the ‘military-industrial complex.’ Suppose, in other words, that we had really meant what, all that time, most of us and most of our leaders were saying, and that we had really tried to live by the traditional values to which we gave lip service. Then, it seems to me, we might have accepted certain
...more

