More on this book
Community
Kindle Notes & Highlights
by
Emily Chang
Read between
February 26 - May 24, 2018
“We have more empathy in the room,” he asserted. “These people are making really emotional decisions about who they connect with.”
To take one example, we need look no further than Twitter-happy Donald Trump.
Some users undoubtedly flocked to other, more permissive sites (you can now find “Fat People Hate” and “Coontown” on a newer Reddit alternative called Voat).
Let me be clear: Our shared goal shouldn’t be to remove all bad behavior, hateful comments, or potentially disturbing imagery from the internet. That is not only impossible, it’s undesirable too, because it involves a slippery slope of deciding whose judgment will determine what’s objectionable.
A more reasonable goal would be to create an online social landscape that roughly mirrors that of a healthy city. In most cities, you can, if you desire, find a dive bar, a strip club, or a rough neighborhood where rude or obnoxious behavior is allowed or even encouraged. But in most public spaces—the parks, restaurants, museums, and theaters—you should be fairly confident that neither you nor your children will be verbally assaulted or followed around by some creep shouting threats.
In previous chapters, I’ve asked this question: How different might the world be if women had been included in this transformative industry from the start?
Butterfield admits that his Rolodex gives him a huge, and somewhat unfair, advantage.