we have three more dimensions of adult development (code, state and depth), and also IQ, specific skills, different levels of education, psychological health, and different ways to evaluate each other’s smarts.
And this is where Hansi's theoretical framework seems to go down the same boundless rabbithole as Wilbers Integral Theory. Yes it might be more correct in several aspects, but is it operationizable (if that is even a word) in a social or political contextin competition with stage 11 (?) guiding principles and rules of thumb that might be faster and morr intelligable for the grass roots?
