Simulation results support conventional wisdom that shorter sprint lengths reduce the gap between market wants and the delivered performance of released products. This is also known as a “fail fast and review often,” strategy, which enables the development organization to learn and adapt to the market. However, a team cannot continue to arbitrarily reduce the sprint length. After a point, the incorporation of a planning delay or slowing down actually improves matters. Incorporating a planning delay enables learning and sensemaking (Nagaraj et al., 2017) and reduces overreaction to spurious
...more