Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
Rate it:
Kindle Notes & Highlights
Read between December 4, 2024 - August 18, 2025
78%
Flag icon
how does a brain attend to, interpret and respond to sensory input?
78%
Flag icon
From my perspective, a conscious person is simply food, rearranged.
79%
Flag icon
qualia,
79%
Flag icon
Scott Aaronson,
79%
Flag icon
“pretty hard problem” (PHP),
79%
Flag icon
“even harder probl...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
79%
Flag icon
“really hard proble...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
79%
Flag icon
Karl Popper popularized the now widely accepted adage “If it’s not falsifiable, it’s not scientific.”
79%
Flag icon
science is all about testing theories against observations: if a theory can’t be tested even in principle, then it’s logically impossible to ever falsify it, which by Popper’s definition means that it’s unscientific.
80%
Flag icon
eponymous
80%
Flag icon
“image classification”
80%
Flag icon
“speech synthesis.”
80%
Flag icon
behavioral correlates of consciousness,
80%
Flag icon
the roughly 107 bits of information that enter our brain each second from our sensory organs, we can be aware only of a tiny fraction, with estimates ranging from 10 to 50 bits.
80%
Flag icon
conscious information processing should be thought of as the CEO of our mind, dealing with only the most important decisions requiring complex analysis of data
80%
Flag icon
Wilder Penfield
80%
Flag icon
the somatosensory cortex
81%
Flag icon
the motor cortex.
81%
Flag icon
ECoG (electrocorticography)
81%
Flag icon
animals with transparent brains—such as the C. elegans worm with its 302 neurons and the larval zebrafish with its about 100,000.
81%
Flag icon
recent research suggests that the primary visual cortex is completely unconscious, together with the cerebellum and brainstem.
81%
Flag icon
Christof Koch
81%
Flag icon
“neural correlates of consciousness” (NCCs),
81%
Flag icon
Do you see two women or a vase? If you look long enough, you’ll subjectively experience both in succession, even though the information reaching your retina remains the same. By measuring what happens in your brain during the two situations, one can tease apart what makes the difference—and
81%
Flag icon
“continuous flash suppression”
81%
Flag icon
if you make one of your eyes watch a complicated sequence of rapidly changing patterns, then this will distract your visual system to such an extent that you’ll be completely unaware of a still image shown to the other eye.
81%
Flag icon
In summary, you can have a visual image in your retina without experiencing it, and you can (while dreaming) experience an image without it being on your retina. This proves that your two retinas don’t host you...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
81%
Flag icon
your consciousness mainly resides in a “hot zone” involving the thalamus (near the middle of your brain) and the rear part of the cortex
82%
Flag icon
the primary visual cortex at the very back of the head is an exception to this, being as unconscious as your eyeballs and your retinas.
82%
Flag icon
it takes about a quarter of a second from when light enters your eye from a complex object until you consciously perceive seeing it
82%
Flag icon
your consiousness lives in the past, with Christof Koch estimating that it lags behind the outside world by about a quarter second.
82%
Flag icon
Intriguingly, you can often react to things faster than you can become conscious of them, which proves that the information processing in charge of your most rapid reactions must be unconscious.
82%
Flag icon
For example, if a foreign object approaches your eye, your blink reflex can close your eyelid wit...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
82%
Flag icon
it takes longer for you to analyze images than sounds because it’s more complicated—which is why Olympic races are started with a bang rather than with a visual cue.
82%
Flag icon
PCCs: physical correlates of consciousness,
83%
Flag icon
Giulio Tononi
83%
Flag icon
If the future state of each part depends only on its own past, not on what the other part has been doing, then Φ = 0: what we called one system is really two independent systems that don’t communicate with each other at all.
83%
Flag icon
Giulio had developed the most mathematically precise consciousness theory to date, integrated information theory (IIT).
83%
Flag icon
the conscious system needs to be integrated into a unified whole, because if it instead consisted of two independent parts, then they’d feel like two separate conscious entities rather than one.
83%
Flag icon
if a conscious part of a brain or computer can’t communicate with the rest, then the rest can’t be part of its subjective experience.
83%
Flag icon
computronium,
83%
Flag icon
blob
83%
Flag icon
under what conditions will a blob of matter be able to do these four things? 1. remember 2. compute 3. learn 4. experience
83%
Flag icon
sentronium
83%
Flag icon
the most general substance that has subjective experience (is sentient).*5
83%
Flag icon
summary, I think that consciousness is a physical phenomenon that feels non-physical because it’s like waves and computations: it has properties independent of its specific physical substrate.
84%
Flag icon
consciousness, but here are four necessary conditions
84%
Flag icon
Clive Wearing,
84%
Flag icon
Scott Aaronson
84%
Flag icon
Murray Shanahan