The Human Predicament: A Candid Guide to Life's Biggest Questions
Rate it:
Open Preview
5%
Flag icon
It is possible for optimists and pessimists to agree on the facts and yet disagree in their evaluations of these facts.
8%
Flag icon
Life has to be given a meaning because of the obvious fact that it has no meaning.
8%
Flag icon
My own view is that a deep pessimism about the meaning of life is entirely appropriate, but that this should not be confused with total nihilism about meaning in life.
14%
Flag icon
Earthly life is thus without significance, import, or purpose beyond our planet.
15%
Flag icon
If loving and serving God is our purpose, the act of creating us sounds like that of a supremely narcissistic rather than a supremely beneficent being.
15%
Flag icon
This purpose smacks of circularity.
16%
Flag icon
the depth of the widespread human need to cope with the harsh realities of the human predicament, including but not limited to the fact that our lives are meaningless in important ways.
16%
Flag icon
Not all of earth is as bad as North Korea, but North Korea is part of “God’s earth”; so are Afghanistan, Burma, China, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Syria, and Zimbabwe, to name but a few appalling places for many to live.
16%
Flag icon
they all occur within the jurisdiction of a purportedly omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent God.
17%
Flag icon
It is much more likely, given the evidence, that our lives lack cosmic meaning than that God exists.
17%
Flag icon
“to reproduce and pass on its genetic material to the next generation.”
18%
Flag icon
When people wonder whether their lives have meaning, they are not likely to be reassured by the observation that they are (merely) a mechanism for replicating genetic material.
18%
Flag icon
It merely provides an explanation of how rather than why we came to exist.27
19%
Flag icon
Instead, people are concerned that the universe (including our own planet and its powerful natural forces) is indifferent to us, that nothing we do makes any difference beyond our planet or in cosmic time, and that human life has no purpose.
19%
Flag icon
Knowing that there is no life anywhere else in the cosmos would bring no solace to those who fear that human life is cosmically meaningless.
19%
Flag icon
We usually, and plausibly, think that we have a much greater impact on our planet than we do on the rest of the cosmos, and that although our planet is as indifferent to us as the rest of the universe, we are at least able to exercise more control over our planet than we are over other parts of the universe.
19%
Flag icon
After all, he says that he does “not mean to deny that the universe we inhabit is bleak, blind and indifferent.”
20%
Flag icon
Similarly, it can be entirely reasonable to relieve headaches and prevent harms to children and yet worry that one’s life as a whole—or human life in general—has no cosmic purpose.
21%
Flag icon
our lives lack the cosmic meaning for which humans so often yearn.
21%
Flag icon
“the fact that the most beautiful and enduring of human artefacts will eventually turn into dust is not a reason for denying that its creation was a worthwhile and meaningful task.”
21%
Flag icon
“Yes, we know that many activities are meaningful sub specie communitatis and sub specie humanitatis, and we are pleased about that, but we are alarmed that our lives have no cosmic meaning. Nothing you have said allays that concern.”
22%
Flag icon
The problem with this, however, is that if it is not worth seeking something that one cannot attain, it can still be appropriate to regret the unattainable.
22%
Flag icon
Regretting the absence of cosmic meaning, it is sometimes argued, is very different from this because there is no conceivable way our lives could have cosmic meaning.
22%
Flag icon
If our lives are irredeemably meaningless sub specie aeternitatis, and no conceivable alternative circumstances could have made things otherwise, it is still the case that our lives are (cosmically) meaningless.
22%
Flag icon
However, I see no reason why we should not regret the absence of some good merely because it is unattainable.
22%
Flag icon
Just because we cannot have cosmic meaning does not mean that we should not think it would be good to have.
23%
Flag icon
The meaning we have from various human perspectives does not give meaning to the entire human enterprise.
23%
Flag icon
The terrestrial meaning is good, but the absence of cosmic meaning is bad.
23%
Flag icon
Our lives can be meaningful, but only from the limited, terrestrial perspectives.
23%
Flag icon
If we lack cosmic meaning but have other kinds of meaning, then some things do matter, even though they only matter from some perspectives.
23%
Flag icon
There is no such thing as the meaning of life. Many different meanings are possible.
23%
Flag icon
We are nonetheless warranted in regretting our cosmic insignificance and the pointlessness of the entire human endeavor.
23%
Flag icon
We serve no purpose in the cosmos and, although our efforts have some significance here and now, it is seriously limited both spatially and temporally.
23%
Flag icon
Therefore does it not seem that Being is a misstep
24%
Flag icon
Both the deficiency of meaning and the poor quality of life are features of the human predicament.
24%
Flag icon
feeling that one’s life is meaningful contributes toward enhancing life’s quality, and feeling that one’s life is meaningless contributes toward reducing the quality of life.
24%
Flag icon
Even when both the good and the bad are mere dumb luck, it is the bad that precipitates the gnawing questions.
24%
Flag icon
The quality of human life is, contrary to what many people think, actually quite appalling.
24%
Flag icon
I believe that while some lives are better than others, none are (noncomparatively or objectively) good.
26%
Flag icon
Thinking that one’s life is better than it actually is can make it better than it would otherwise be.
26%
Flag icon
it does not follow that one’s life is actually going as well as one thinks it is.
26%
Flag icon
Although each fate does not befall every one of us, our very existence puts us at risk for these outcomes, and the cumulative risk of something horrific occurring to each one of us is simply enormous.
28%
Flag icon
Our lives contain so much more bad than good in part because of a series of empirical differences between bad things and good things.
28%
Flag icon
Chronic pain is rampant, but there is no such thing as chronic pleasure.
28%
Flag icon
The worst pains are also worse than the best pleasures are good.
28%
Flag icon
Thereafter, from one’s early twenties and on, one begins the long, slow decline.
29%
Flag icon
Even when fulfilled desires are everything that they were expected to be, the satisfaction is typically transitory, as the fulfilled desires yield to new desires.
29%
Flag icon
Life is thus a constant state of striving. There are sometimes reprieves, but the striving ends only with the end of life.
29%
Flag icon
Notice too that while the bad things come without any effort, one has to strive to ward them off and attain the good things.
29%
Flag icon
Thus, one hopes to live a life that is, by human standards, a long life, and we hope to gain expertise in some, perhaps very focused, area.
« Prev 1 3