Introducing Game Theory: A Graphic Guide (Graphic Guides)
Rate it:
Open Preview
Kindle Notes & Highlights
Read between August 19 - August 19, 2020
49%
Flag icon
To avoid future punishment, players may choose to be cooperative.
73%
Flag icon
Therefore, we can be pretty sure that this is not yet an approach the major superpowers have taken.
77%
Flag icon
Of course, a firm has every incentive to claim that its product is of high quality, whether it is or not. So, direct statements by the firm have no value.
79%
Flag icon
Through self-selection, the warranty allows a high-quality product firm to differentiate itself from a low-quality product firm.
81%
Flag icon
But this works only if the members of the community know that they have shared beliefs as a basis for their interaction. Since membership of the community provides some material benefits, non-believers have an incentive to pretend to be true believers.
84%
Flag icon
Every person on the committee has transitive preferences and votes sincerely. But when acting as a group the committee’s preferences are non-transitive – whatever it chooses, the group will always think that another option is better.
85%
Flag icon
Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem makes a lot of the strange behaviour we see in committee meetings and in parliaments more understandable. For instance, in committee work we frequently see the same issue coming up over and over again.