Although the Multiplier/Diminisher framework might appear binary, I wish to emphasize that there is a continuum between Multipliers and Diminishers, with just a small number of people at either polar extreme.
Throughout the book she talks about behavior which can be learned and changed, but she's using the language of "be" you ARE a multiplier or a diminisher. In other words, while she says there is a continuum, she writes as if the choice is either/or.
