Niels Bohr said that “the opposite of a great truth is also true,” and that was good, but what about the not-quite-opposite-that-was-sorta-true-at-one-point-and-now-feels-suddenly-relevant… that is the one that needs another go around. I would love to see the authenticity of a negotiation rhetoric that does not beget rigid binary positions, without a winner and a loser, something wider please….
