Creating Religious Freedom: 16th Century Revolution that Sparked Christian Dispersion

by Arthur H. Bishop

John Colet (1466-1519) was an English cleric and humanist scholar who, though he had no knowledge of Greek or Hebrew, insisted on interpreting ancient documents in their original historic setting. Along with his close friend Thomas More, Colet was continually questioning any interpretation of the Bible that took scripture out of its original background. For Colet and his followers, the meaning of the Biblical texts began with the historical setting of the scripture in question from that starting point additional interpretations could be added if needed. The use of historical context as the priority was contrary to the prevailing exegetical method used by contemporary Roman Catholic theologians of literal or allegorical, and theological interpretations of the text without regard for the historical context.

In relating to scripture, Luther held that scripture alone was the foundation of the church without interpretations by popes, councils, bishops, priests. Any Christian could read the Bible and interpret scripture for himself.

“A simple layman armed with scripture is to be believed above a pope or a council.”

My conscience is captive to the Word of God. I cannot and I will not recant anything for to go against conscience is neither right nor safe.

the person who does not or cannot accept salvation by faith, his conscience is continually troubled by trying to do good works in order to be acceptable to God.