Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow
Rate it:
Open Preview
Read between October 14 - November 5, 2019
23%
Flag icon
humdrum
23%
Flag icon
iota
23%
Flag icon
dogma,
23%
Flag icon
That I am an ‘in-dividual’ implies that my true self is a holistic entity rather than an assemblage of separate parts. This indivisible essence allegedly endures from one moment to the next without losing or absorbing anything.
23%
Flag icon
That’s why the theory of evolution cannot accept the idea of souls, at least if by ‘soul’ we mean something indivisible, immutable and potentially eternal. Such an entity cannot possibly result from a step-by-step evolution.
23%
Flag icon
Evolution means change, and is incapable of producing everlasting entities.
24%
Flag icon
However, throughout this process the robot doesn’t experience anything. In contrast, a human being depleted of energy feels hunger and craves to stop this unpleasant sensation.
24%
Flag icon
ascribe
24%
Flag icon
eponymous
25%
Flag icon
Subjective experiences explained human actions.
25%
Flag icon
what happens in the mind that doesn’t happen in the brain?
26%
Flag icon
ether,
26%
Flag icon
loom.
26%
Flag icon
ascertain
26%
Flag icon
To do so the scientists started with the assumption that whenever humans report that they are conscious of something, they can be believed.
27%
Flag icon
‘Convergent evidence indicates that non-human animals have the neuroanatomical, neurochemical and neurophysiological substrates of conscious states along with the capacity to exhibit intentional behaviours. Consequently, the weight of evidence indicates that humans are not unique in possessing the neurological substrates that generate consciousness.
27%
Flag icon
sentient
27%
Flag icon
The Canadian province of Quebec has since passed a similar Act, and other countries are likely to follow suit.
27%
Flag icon
apathetic
28%
Flag icon
flail
28%
Flag icon
Only humans understand themselves as an enduring self that has a past and a future, perhaps because only humans can use language in order to contemplate their past experiences and future actions.
28%
Flag icon
bales
28%
Flag icon
straw
28%
Flag icon
He is simply overwhelmed by an unexplained ecstasy.15
29%
Flag icon
When I donate money to a beggar, am I not reacting to the unpleasant sensations that the sight of the beggar causes me to feel? Do I really care about the beggar, or do I simply want to feel better myself?16
29%
Flag icon
Prussian
29%
Flag icon
Twenty thousand years ago, the average Sapiens probably had higher intelligence and better toolmaking skills than the average Sapiens of today.
29%
Flag icon
but because Homo sapiens is the only species on earth capable of cooperating flexibly in large numbers.
30%
Flag icon
alacrity,
30%
Flag icon
Flanked
30%
Flag icon
cronies
30%
Flag icon
apparatchiks
31%
Flag icon
hallowed
31%
Flag icon
pygmy
31%
Flag icon
Sapiens don’t behave according to a cold mathematical logic, but rather according to a warm social logic.
31%
Flag icon
incensed.
32%
Flag icon
siphon
32%
Flag icon
Intersubjective entities depend on communication among many humans rather than on the beliefs and feelings of individual humans.
32%
Flag icon
Yet in truth the lives of most people have meaning only within the network of stories they tell one another.
33%
Flag icon
enmeshed
33%
Flag icon
dishevelled
33%
Flag icon
gaggle
33%
Flag icon
hence,
33%
Flag icon
chimeras.
34%
Flag icon
dammed
34%
Flag icon
wove
34%
Flag icon
The Agricultural Revolution, which began about 12,000 years ago, provided the necessary material base for enlarging and strengthening the intersubjective networks.
34%
Flag icon
tithes
34%
Flag icon
tilling
35%
Flag icon
merging the priest-king with the god to create a living deity – pharaoh.