The Undoing Project: A Friendship That Changed Our Minds
Rate it:
Open Preview
Read between November 30, 2020 - January 2, 2021
0%
Flag icon
Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is an absurd one. —Voltaire
5%
Flag icon
He suggested a new definition of the nerd: a person who knows his own mind well enough to mistrust it.
10%
Flag icon
Why had so much conventional wisdom been bullshit? And not just in sports but across the whole society.
19%
Flag icon
“When someone says something, don’t ask yourself if it is true. Ask what it might be true of.” That was his intellectual instinct, his natural first step to the mental hoop: to take whatever someone had just said to him and try not to tear it down but to make sense of it.
23%
Flag icon
“All your economic models are premised on people being smart and rational, and yet all the people you know are idiots.”
Nelson Paz y Miño
Amos
25%
Flag icon
Which field we go into may depend on which high school teacher we happen to meet. Who we marry may depend on who happens to be around at the right time of life.
29%
Flag icon
When people make decisions, they are also making judgments about similarity, between some object in the real world and what they ideally want.
29%
Flag icon
By changing the context in which two things are compared, you submerge certain features and force others to the surface.
29%
Flag icon
Things are grouped together for a reason, but, once they are grouped, their grouping causes them to seem more like each other than they otherwise would. That is, the mere act of classification reinforces stereotypes. If you want to weaken some stereotype, eliminate the classification.
32%
Flag icon
“it is part of the human condition that we are statistically punished for rewarding others and rewarded for punishing them.”
Nelson Paz y Miño
Kahneman
40%
Flag icon
When you are a pessimist and the bad thing happens, you live it twice,
Nelson Paz y Miño
Amos
41%
Flag icon
“Even the fairest coin, however, given the limitations of its memory and moral sense, cannot be as fair as the gambler expects it to be,”
46%
Flag icon
Well, even experts are human. “The clinician is not a machine,” he wrote. “While he possesses his full share of human learning and hypothesis-generating skills, he lacks the machine’s reliability. He ‘has his days’: Boredom, fatigue, illness, situational and interpersonal distractions all plague him, with the result that his repeated judgments of the exact same stimulus configuration are not identical. . . . If we could remove some of this human unreliability by eliminating this random error in his judgments, we should thereby increase the validity of the resulting predictions . . .”
Nelson Paz y Miño
Goldberg
47%
Flag icon
If they both committed the same mental errors, or were tempted to commit them, they assumed—rightly, as it turned out—that most other people would commit them, too.
48%
Flag icon
people faced with a problem that had a statistically correct answer did not think like statisticians. Even statisticians did not think like statisticians.
50%
Flag icon
Human judgment was distorted by . . . the memorable.
50%
Flag icon
not just that people don’t know what they don’t know, but that they don’t bother to factor their ignorance into their judgments.
53%
Flag icon
“When no specific evidence is given, the prior probabilities are properly utilized; when worthless specific evidence is given, prior probabilities are ignored.”
54%
Flag icon
Man’s inability to see the power of regression to the mean leaves him blind to the nature of the world around him.
54%
Flag icon
“most advances in science come not from eureka moments but from ‘hmmm, that’s funny.’”
Nelson Paz y Miño
Biedersman
54%
Flag icon
Once we have adopted a particular hypothesis or interpretation, we grossly exaggerate the likelihood of that hypothesis, and find it very difficult to see things any other way.
Nelson Paz y Miño
Amos
55%
Flag icon
“He who sees the past as surprise-free is bound to have a future full of surprises.”
Nelson Paz y Miño
Amos
59%
Flag icon
Just because the patient is better after I treated him doesn’t mean he got better because I treated him,
Nelson Paz y Miño
Redelmeir
59%
Flag icon
“In math you always check your work. In medicine, no. And if we are fallible in algebra, where the answers are clear, how much more fallible must we be in a world where the answers are much less clear?”
Nelson Paz y Miño
Refelmeier
59%
Flag icon
“They provided a language and a logic for articulating some of the pitfalls people encounter when they think. Now these mistakes could be communicated. It was the recognition of human error. Not its denial. Not its demonization. Just the understanding that they are part of human nature.”
Nelson Paz y Miño
Redelmeier
61%
Flag icon
A part of good science is to see what everyone else can see but think what no one else has ever said.
Nelson Paz y Miño
Amos
61%
Flag icon
So many problems occur when people fail to be obedient when they are supposed to be obedient, and fail to be creative when they are supposed to be creative.
Nelson Paz y Miño
Amos
62%
Flag icon
They didn’t simply experience fixed levels of happiness or unhappiness. They experienced one thing and remembered something else.
63%
Flag icon
“Last impressions can be lasting impressions.”
Nelson Paz y Miño
Redelmeier
66%
Flag icon
“quite likely that the fate of entire societies may be sealed by a series of avoidable mistakes committed by their leaders.”
Nelson Paz y Miño
Kahneman
67%
Flag icon
“No one ever made a decision because of a number. They need a story.”
Nelson Paz y Miño
Danny K.
68%
Flag icon
Gamblers accepted bets with negative expected values; if they didn’t, casinos wouldn’t exist.
69%
Flag icon
“It is a given that people who use mathematics have some glamour,” said Danny. “It was prestigious because it borrowed the aura of mathematics and because nobody else could understand what was going on there.”
70%
Flag icon
The understanding of any decision had to account not just for the financial consequences but for the emotional ones, too.
70%
Flag icon
“It is the anticipation of regret that affects decisions, along with the anticipation of other consequences.”
Nelson Paz y Miño
Danny
70%
Flag icon
“What might have been is an essential component of misery,’”
Nelson Paz y Miño
Danny
70%
Flag icon
Happy people did not dwell on some imagined unhappiness the way unhappy people imagined what they might have done differently so that they might be happy.
70%
Flag icon
People did not seek to avoid other emotions with the same energy they sought to avoid regret.
70%
Flag icon
When they made decisions, people did not seek to maximize utility. They sou...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
70%
Flag icon
“In defiance of logic, there is a definite sense that one comes closer to winning the lottery when one’s ticket number is similar to the number that won,”
Nelson Paz y Miño
Danny
71%
Flag icon
People regretted what they had done, and what they wished they hadn’t done, far more than what they had not done and perhaps should have.
71%
Flag icon
“The pain that is experienced when the loss is caused by an act that modified the status quo is significantly greater than the pain that is experienced when the decision led to the retention of the status quo,”
Nelson Paz y Miño
Danny
71%
Flag icon
“When one fails to take action that could have avoided a disaster, one does not accept responsibility for the occurrence of the disaster.”
Nelson Paz y Miño
Danny
71%
Flag icon
The more control you felt you had over the outcome of a gamble, the greater the regret you experienced if the gamble turned out badly.
72%
Flag icon
The odds that people demanded to accept a certain loss over the chance of some greater loss crudely mirrored the odds they demanded to forgo a certain gain for the chance of a greater gain.
72%
Flag icon
When choosing between sure things and gambles, people’s desire to avoid loss exceeded their desire to secure gain.
73%
Flag icon
For most people, the happiness involved in receiving a desirable object is smaller than the unhappiness involved in losing the same object.”
75%
Flag icon
People did not choose between things. They chose between descriptions of things.
77%
Flag icon
The irrational behavior of the few would not be offset by the rational behavior of the many. People could be systematically wrong, and so markets could be systematically wrong, too.
77%
Flag icon
“Science is a conversation and you have to compete for the right to be heard. And the competition has its rules. And the rules, oddly enough, are that you are tested on formal theory.”
Nelson Paz y Miño
Danny
« Prev 1