More on this book
Community
Kindle Notes & Highlights
another. I became terrified of the idea that I would perhaps knock one or more fingers clean off.
johnny dangerously liked this
did, I broke down the vision of the Ding an sich, or reasserted the prison of categorical perception,
brow furrowed so deeply it was as though the book was a plough, carving up the soil of his head,
johnny dangerously liked this
through a work of German philosophy – that same Freddie Nietzsche upon whom the clever set in London is so keen. I read for the second time my copy of Herbert Wells’s War of the Worlds.
I like how this mirrors the reading genres of the guys in the antartic at the beginning of the novel
johnny dangerously liked this
The strong legislate what is true, and after a while we forget that this is whence it came. Our habits of thought are stronger than strait-waistcoats. We walk about with habit-coloured spectacles before our eyes, and see everything as we are accustomed to see it.’
‘Is the choice so stark, though? Slavery of the mind, or ignorance?’
Schopenhauer believed will the structuring principle of the universe; and what is will if not the idiom of mind?
involuntary celibacy. It occurs to me that most people live this way. It occurs to me, too, that art, literature and culture have been rather derelict in their duty so far as capturing this essential truth of things is concerned.
I was filled with insight, the way my skull is filled with my brain. The insight sat snugly inside me, as if the cavity had been designed to be exactly the right size to fit it. The insight was something like this: distinguishing between the outside world and my inner existence was abruptly revealed to me as a false step. Or not quite that. It was the realisation that I had been construing that distinction wrongly all this time. It was not a separation. It was an inflection, a refinement. It was a connection. The world and I constituted not two separate things, but a totality.
The real clincher for me is: Alzheimer’s. If mind is a product of brain, then as the disease deteriorates the brain you’d expect to see the mind decay. And that’s exactly what we do see.’
Let’s see if we can’t get further with the problems of metaphysics by assuming that the objects must conform to our cognition. Like Copernicus, who said: I know what it looks like, that the stars go around the Earth. But let’s imagine it’s the other way about, and see if that doesn’t explain things better.’
Kant is like an anti-Copernicus. We used to think we were just a part of a pre-existing cosmos, until Kant comes along and shows that, no, actually we make the universe by perceiving it.
Every time a consciousness comes into awareness and self-awareness, it’s a conceptual big bang. Space and time structure the reality of things anew with each perceiving mind.’
‘The transcendental categories are true. Space and time as intuitions of perception, not structures innate to reality. The necessary subjectivity of all scientific investigation.’

