Better Living Through Criticism: How to Think about Art, Pleasure, Beauty and Truth
Rate it:
Open Preview
5%
Flag icon
It’s the job of art to free our minds, and the task of criticism to figure out what to do with that freedom.
10%
Flag icon
The new does not occur in a vacuum; it requires materials.
Chad Kohalyk
And thus criticism uses art to create its own new. Meta-art is art too, is it not? I mean, that is what every other artist is doing, right?
10%
Flag icon
dreams of casting a spell like the one he finds himself under.
28%
Flag icon
The world is enormous. Travel is exhausting. Time travel is impossible. But you can go anywhere, to any period in history, in the pages of a book or sitting in front of a screen, and acquire a more intimate, richer sense of what is found there than you would through classroom study or organized travel. You can get inside feelings and habits.
33%
Flag icon
Aesthetic bliss, in principle universally available, must in practice be contained, limited, even minimized.
36%
Flag icon
The consumer economy is profoundly unequal, raising barriers to entry on the basis of income and access rather than pedigree. And the story of human progress, of opening minds and increasingly cosmopolitan pleasures, is also a tale of loss, of standardization and homogenization.
40%
Flag icon
critics are vermin and their prey is a flower.
43%
Flag icon
If criticism is—or should be—a way not just of expressing love for art but also of making love to it, what does that make the people who do it for money?
Chad Kohalyk
Lol
59%
Flag icon
A piece of music makes no obvious argument, tells no literal story, soars above politics and history in an ether where logic and feeling coexist interchangeably. When Walter Pater wrote that “All art constantly aspires towards the condition of music,” he was making a claim not only about all art but also about all criticism, whose job is to isolate those attributes of other specimens of art that bring them closest to music and are least burdened with representational duties.
60%
Flag icon
If music is pure form, then criticism is surely its antithesis: pure argument, absolute matter.
66%
Flag icon
James goes on to liken the press to “a regular train which starts at an advertised hour, but which is free to start only if every seat be occupied. The seats are many, the train is ponderously long, and hence the manufacture of dummies for the seasons when there are not passengers enough. A stuffed manikin is thrust into the empty seat, where it makes a creditable figure till the end of the journey.”
69%
Flag icon
And the logic of trade—of the commodity form—declares all content to be equivalent.
69%
Flag icon
Metrics can be applied to circulation—copies sold, advertising rates, page views—but everyone who actually reads knows that the essence of written discourse is qualitative.
73%
Flag icon
“Making a living is nothing,” Elizabeth Hardwick declared in the first sentence of an essay called “Grub Street: New York,” which was first published in 1963 in the inaugural issue of the New York Review of Books. “[T]he great difficulty is making a point, making a difference—with words.”
75%
Flag icon
The professional is the one who does not do it for free, but also the one who does not do it only for money—the
77%
Flag icon
a critic is a person whose interest can help to activate the interest of others.