Kindle Notes & Highlights
by
Yasmin Khan
Read between
May 25 - May 30, 2016
The war flattened out the pretensions of empire, making ceremonial and ritual excesses look archaic, challenging old compacts between the King-Emperor and the landed elites. It mobilised women, workers and the urban middle classes in radical new ways. It heightened nationalism, both in
His failure to consult and to make a concerted effort to join forces with Indian leaders at the very start of the war would have catastrophic consequences for years to come; within eight weeks, the new political settlement of 1937, which
The princes knew from their experiences of the First World War that this was an opportunity to cement their loyalty to the British and to prop up the existing political order. Many of them also had close ties to the military, had been educated at Sandhurst or in British schools and felt a strong affinity with the cause. The Nepali regent, desperate to defend his country’s own sovereignty, surprised the Commanding Officers by his obsequiousness.
There was pressure on local civil servants to generate funds and the amounts that they amassed were reported back to their superiors (along with the number of men recruited) in a pyramid of extraction. For Manzoor Alam Quraishi, a junior civil servant in United Provinces at the start of the war,
But this money was not just extracted from the landed, but also raised by burdening poor peasants who were already struggling under inflation and the dazzling rises in the cost of
funding war fell on both rich and poor but much more heavilh on poor who alo suffered fyom effects of inflationi basic goods
Compounding the sense of frustration and uncertainty among British administrators was the plain fact that British rule had self-evidently not delivered on its promises: 90 per cent of the population of the country still faced dire and inescapable poverty. The vast majority of people lived in
British rule obviously a failure for 90 percent of Indians. msny new arrivals witb no stake in th past were horrified and interested in chanve
India’s poverty was endemic.
lived as subsistence farmers relying on their crops, subject to indenture and debt, victims of landlords and their henchmen, living precarious lives vulnerable to small changes in wage patterns, natural catastrophes or calamities. Caste discrimination,
they fell back on culturalist assumptions about the Hindu and the Muslim, or on stereotypes of Gandhian non-violence. India had simply not grasped anti-fascism with both hands, it was too often believed, because it was too backward, irrational or undeveloped, or its people were too uneducated, superstitious or unable to see the international picture. The very real problems of ruinous inflation or the very obvious subjugation of Indian political rights were not seen by many British onlookers as strong enough reasons for resistance.
The government severely overestimated the Indian peasant’s ability to cut back, living as he or she often did on the margins of viable existence in the first place. As the Bhore Committee Report on public health in India had already
govt idea of famine ib bengal influenced by British policy of "making do" with a little less but rural indians already at point of stsrvstion before famine
symbolic of the uncertainty and unprecedented change that was taking place. Similarly, the failure of the state to trace or pass on information about Indian prisoners of war deeply unsettled their families and kin. Widespread corruption and the impression
Khan continually draws parallels between activities of individuals and the larger move toward independence. some like here are labored

