Introducing Hegel: A Graphic Guide (Graphic Guides)
Rate it:
Open Preview
Kindle Notes & Highlights
Read between June 10 - June 12, 2019
37%
Flag icon
Individuality satisfied in itself,
Paul
Working definition of actualization?
48%
Flag icon
This formulation of Hegel’s triadic logic is convenient, but it must be emphasized that he never used the terms thesis, antithesis and synthesis.
60%
Flag icon
Hegel, like von Hardenberg, endorses constitutional monarchy.
65%
Flag icon
understanding, although a necessary stage of thought, is less philosophical than Reason.
Paul
Understanding arguments is less cognitive / analytical than reasoning about them — not just do you have a block for it and / or can you claim it doesn’t link , but thinking further about what this argument is actually saying and what that means in context will allow you to further build a coherent, consistent, and more complete thoughtful response. Same with scientific inquiry
69%
Flag icon
Paul
So abstract / modern art, gtfo?
73%
Flag icon
philosophy goes beyond both art and religion because it expresses the Absolute in pure speculative terms and is therefore able to synthesize all other forms of expression.
85%
Flag icon
Critical Theory
85%
Flag icon
Paul
Positivism here is the idea that logical analysis solves every meaningful problem in philosophy
85%
Flag icon
Only a permanently self-critical approach to theory can avoid paralysis.
86%
Flag icon
Paul
Look up Negative Dialectic
86%
Flag icon
Jacques Derrida’s own project, although not Marxist, is also one of negative dialectics indebted to Hegel as the first “deconstructionist”.
86%
Flag icon
Critical Theory in its “postmodern” form still uses Hegelian methods, but acknowledges a residue of reality which will always escape total theorization.
86%
Flag icon
totalization that is recognized either as “bad” (totalitarianism) or entirely “collapsed” (the end of Grand Narratives).
88%
Flag icon
Hegel’s retrospective historicism had to be transmuted into historical futurism.
Paul
That sounds like a very risky process. One can see how a large amount of fidelity to the original work could be lost when the work explicitly says that we can say nothing about the future
88%
Flag icon
Paul
Right here simply meaning rationally explainable , not normatively “ good” or “just” in any metaphysical way as I’m sure Hegel would agree.