The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins
Rate it:
Open Preview
1%
Flag icon
EVER SINCE THE ENLIGHTENMENT, WESTERN PHILOSOphers have shown us a Nature that is grand and universal but also passive and mechanical. Nature was a backdrop and resource for the moral intentionality of Man, which could tame and master Nature.
2%
Flag icon
Imagine “first nature” to mean ecological relations (including humans) and “second nature” to refer to capitalist transformations of the environment.
2%
Flag icon
William Cronon’s Nature’s Metropolis.
2%
Flag icon
“third nature,” that is, what manages to live des...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
3%
Flag icon
Precarity once seemed the fate of the less fortunate. Now it seems that all our lives are precarious—even when, for the moment, our pockets are lined.
3%
Flag icon
Such sensibilities will be needed for the end of global progress’s easy summer: the autumn aroma
4%
Flag icon
the history of the human concentration of wealth through making both humans and nonhumans into resources for investment.
4%
Flag icon
Alienation obviates living-space entanglement.
5%
Flag icon
Thus, simplification for alienation produces ruins, spaces of abandonment for asset production.
7%
Flag icon
Precarity is the condition of being vulnerable to others. Unpredictable encounters transform us; we are not in control, even of ourselves. Unable to rely on a stable structure of community, we are thrown into shifting assemblages, which remake us as well as our others.
7%
Flag icon
A precarious world is a world without teleology. Indeterminacy, the unplanned nature of time, is frightening, but thinking through precarity makes it evident that indeterminacy also makes life possible.
8%
Flag icon
history without progress is indeterminate and multidirectional, might assemblages show us its possibilities?
9%
Flag icon
This book argues that staying alive—for every species—requires livable collaborations. Collaboration means working across difference, which leads to contamination. Without collaborations, we all die.
11%
Flag icon
Perhaps, like the war survivors themselves, we need to tell and tell until all our stories of death and near-death and gratuitous life are standing with us to face the challenges of the present.
11%
Flag icon
It is in listening to that cacophony of troubled stories that we might encounter our best hopes for precarious survival.
11%
Flag icon
Scalability, in contrast, is the ability of a project to change scales smoothly without any change in project frames.
11%
Flag icon
Thus, too, scalability banishes meaningful diversity, that is, diversity that might change things.
14%
Flag icon
These histories, both human and not human, are never robotic programs but rather condensations in the indeterminate here and now; the past we grasp, as philosopher Walter Benjamin puts it, is a memory “that flashes in a moment of danger.”
15%
Flag icon
enact history, Benjamin writes, as “a tiger’s leap into that which has gone before.”7
15%
Flag icon
the indeterminate experience of encounter, with its tiger’s leap into history. What
16%
Flag icon
Amassing wealth is possible without rationalizing labor and raw materials. Instead, it requires acts of translation across varied social and political spaces, which, borrowing from ecologists’ usage, I call “patches.”
16%
Flag icon
“Salvage accumulation” is the process through which lead firms amass capital without controlling the conditions under which commodities are produced. Salvage is not an ornament on ordinary capitalist processes; it is a feature of how capitalism works.
16%
Flag icon
“Supply chains” are commodity chains that translate value to the benefit of dominant firms; translation between noncapitalist and capitalist value systems is what they
16%
Flag icon
The conversion of indigenous knowledge into capitalist returns is salvage accumulation.
17%
Flag icon
Savage and salvage are often twins: Salvage translates violence and pollution into profit.
17%
Flag icon
Such translation is the central problem of many global supply chains.
22%
Flag icon
In France they have two kinds, freedom and communist. In the U.S. they just have one kind: freedom.
22%
Flag icon
Freedom as they described it is both an axis of commonality and a point from which communally specific agendas divide.
22%
Flag icon
Freedom can be found in war as well as against war.
25%
Flag icon
this practice, militarism is internalized; it infuses the landscape; it inspires strategies of foraging and entrepreneurship.
25%
Flag icon
American precarity—living in ruins—is in this unstructured multiplicity, this uncongealed confusion. No longer a melting pot, we live with unrecognizable others.
28%
Flag icon
Global supply chains ended expectations of progress because they allowed lead corporations to let go of their commitment to controlling labor.
56%
Flag icon
the stratosphere is full of fungal spores;
59%
Flag icon
This is called “di-mon” mating, from the prefixes for “two”—the number of chromosome copies in fungal body cells—and “one”—the number in the germinating spore.19 It’s as if I decided to mate with (not clone) my own arm: how queer.
63%
Flag icon
WAITING to see if mushrooms might emerge is thus an existential problem.