A Random Walk Down Wall Street: The Time-Tested Strategy for Successful Investing
Rate it:
45%
Flag icon
illusion of control that can lead investors to see trends that do not exist or to believe that they can spot a stock-price pattern that will predict future prices.
45%
Flag icon
mistakenly to use “similarity” or “representativeness” as a proxy for sound probabilistic thinking.
46%
Flag icon
“representative heuristic”
46%
Flag icon
particular group should combine “representativeness” with base rates (the percentage of the population falling into various groups).
46%
Flag icon
informed discussion of the group improves the decision-making process. The wisdom of crowd
46%
Flag icon
Groups of individuals will sometimes reinforce one another into believing that some incorrect point of view is, in fact, the correct one.
46%
Flag icon
what other people said actually changed what subjects believed they saw. It seems that other people’s errors actually affect how someone perceives the external world.
47%
Flag icon
People’s choices are motivated instead by the values they assign to gains and losses. Losses are considered far more undesirable than equivalent gains are desirable.
47%
Flag icon
language used to present the possible gains and losses will influence the final decision that is made.
47%
Flag icon
loss aversion leads many investors to make costly mistakes.
47%
Flag icon
In the face of sure losses, people seem to exhibit risk-seeking behavior.
47%
Flag icon
people are risk-averse when considering possible gains
47%
Flag icon
emotions of pride and regret may be behind the tendency of investors to hold on to their losing positions and to sell their winners.
47%
Flag icon
reluctance to take losses is clearly non-optimal according to rational investment theory
47%
Flag icon
Selling stocks with gains (outside tax-advantaged retirement accounts) involves paying capital gains taxes. Selling stock on which losses have been realized involves reducing taxes
48%
Flag icon
Behavioralists believe that important limits to arbitrage exist that prevent out-of-whack prices from being corrected.
48%
Flag icon
who tries to “correct” perceived mispricings also runs the risk that investors will become even more overenthusiastic about the prospects for the “overpriced” security.
48%
Flag icon
The market can remain irrational longer than the arbitrageur can remain solvent. This
48%
Flag icon
the security that is shorted is borrowed in order to deliver it to the buyer.
48%
Flag icon
For an arbitrage to be effective, there must be a similar fairly priced security that can be bought to offset the short position and that can be expected to rise if some favorable event occurs that influences the whole market or the sector
48%
Flag icon
cannot rely completely on arbitrage to smooth out any deviations of market
49%
Flag icon
If you sit down at the table and can’t figure out who the sucker is, get up and leave because it’s you.
49%
Flag icon
Any investment that has become a topic of widespread conversation is likely to be especially hazardous to your wealth.
49%
Flag icon
the portfolios of those households that traded the most substantially underperformed more passive benchmarks.
49%
Flag icon
The decision not to sell is exactly the same as the decision to buy the stock at the current price.
50%
Flag icon
IPOs underperform the total stock market
50%
Flag icon
will never be allowed to buy the really good IPOs at the initial offering price. The hot IPOs are snapped up by the big institutional investors
50%
Flag icon
Steer clear of any hot tips.
50%
Flag icon
“Market timing can only be accomplished by liars.”
50%
Flag icon
definition of “smart beta”
50%
Flag icon
gain excess (greater than market) returns by using a variety of relatively passive investment strategies that involve no more risk than would be assumed by investing in a low-cost Total Stock Market index
50%
Flag icon
tilt (or flavor) the portfolio in some direction such as “value” versus “growth,” smaller versus larger companies, relatively strong stocks versus weak, and low-volatility stocks versus high-volatility ones.
51%
Flag icon
Value Wins
51%
Flag icon
in low-multiple stocks. If growth does materialize, both the earnings and the earnings multiple will likely increase, giving the investor a double benefit.
51%
Flag icon
Stocks that sell at low ratios of price to book value tend to produce higher future returns.
51%
Flag icon
Never forget that low P/E multiples and low price-to-book-value (P/BV) ratios can reflect risk factors that are priced into the market.
51%
Flag icon
Smaller Is Better
51%
Flag icon
small-company stocks to generate larger returns than those of large-company stocks.
51%
Flag icon
small firms may be riskier than larger firms and deserve to give investors a higher rate of return.
51%
Flag icon
risk-adjusted basis depends upon how one measures risk.
51%
Flag icon
Momentum and Reversion to the Mean
51%
Flag icon
short holding periods, there is some evidence of momentum in the stock market.
51%
Flag icon
based on behavioral considerations; the second, on sluggish responses to new information.
52%
Flag icon
statistically strong pattern of return reversal, but not one that implied an inefficiency in the market that would enable investors to make excess returns.
52%
Flag icon
Low Volatility Can Produce High Returns
52%
Flag icon
the higher the beta (risk) of any stock or portfolio, the higher should be the return.
52%
Flag icon
empirical support for the theory is weak.
52%
Flag icon
Relatively undiversified portfolios are a characteristic of all the “smart beta” strategies.
52%
Flag icon
“smart beta” strategies represent active management rather than indexing.
53%
Flag icon
If “smart beta” funds generate above average returns, it can’t be at the expense of traditional index-fund investors—it must be at the expense of all active managers who do not hold the market portfolio.