A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius
Rate it:
Open Preview
Read between July 8 - July 30, 2022
2%
Flag icon
was walking— I would say “hiking,” if we were doing anything but walking, but since we were just walking, I will not use the word “hiking,” which everyone feels compelled to use anytime they’re outside and there’s a slight incline
3%
Flag icon
“Ooh, look at me, I’m Dave, I’m writing a book! With all my thoughts in it! La la la!” (Christopher Eggers)
4%
Flag icon
Besides, if you are bothered by the idea of this being real, you are invited to do what the author should have done, and what authors and readers have been doing since the beginning of time:
4%
Flag icon
PRETEND IT’S FICTION.
4%
Flag icon
The author wishes to acknowledge that because this book is occasionally haha, you are permitted to dismiss it. The author wishes to acknowledge your problems with the title. He too has reservations.
5%
Flag icon
no one, except an electorate, likes a liar.
7%
Flag icon
FLOUTING
7%
Flag icon
SUBLIMATION
7%
Flag icon
SOLIPSISM
8%
Flag icon
Now.
8%
Flag icon
The author would like to acknowledge your desire to get started with the plot, the body of the book, the story.
8%
Flag icon
He will get on with that story any moment now,
8%
Flag icon
He acknowledges the needs and feelings of a reader, the fact that a reader only has so much time, so much patience—that seemingly endless screwing about, interminable clearing of one’s throat, can very easily look like, or even become, a sort of contemptuous stalling, a putting-off of one’s readers, and no one wants that. (Or do they?)
8%
Flag icon
glasnost,
12%
Flag icon
endocrine;
29%
Flag icon
Harriet Tubman,
29%
Flag icon
“It wasn’t your fault.” He loves that line, especially when he tacks on: “Or was it?”)
32%
Flag icon
I mean, it was almost as if it was too much to happen in one day, as if a number of days had been spliced together to quickly paint a picture of an entire period of time, to create a whole-seeming idea of how we are living, without having to stoop (or rise) to actually pacing the story out.”
32%
Flag icon
“You know, to be honest, though, what I see is less a problem with form, all that garbage, and more a problem of conscience. You’re completely paralyzed with guilt about relating all this in the first place, especially the stuff earlier on. You feel somehow obligated to do it, but you also know that Mom and Dad would hate it, would crucify you—
32%
Flag icon
your father being in AA
33%
Flag icon
unraveling,
35%
Flag icon
JFKFC;
36%
Flag icon
Westerberg hair.
44%
Flag icon
this is 1993,
48%
Flag icon
I was twelve when I realized “balls” referred to testicles, and not the two cheeks of your butt.
48%
Flag icon
Then Mr. T moved in.
48%
Flag icon
Ordinary People
48%
Flag icon
he started cutting down all the trees.
Christopher Whalen
Chainsaw Dan Snyder!
49%
Flag icon
So tell me something: This isn’t really a transcript of the interview, is it? No. It’s not much like the actual interview at all, is it? Not that much, no. This is a device, this interview style. Manufactured and fake. It is.
50%
Flag icon
squeezing all these things into the Q&A makes complete the transition from the book’s first half,
50%
Flag icon
which is slightly less self-conscious, to the second half, which is increasingly self-devouring.
51%
Flag icon
You need someone who’ll actually care about and debate the “tomahawk chop,” the Redskins and everything.
Christopher Whalen
Redskins!
51%
Flag icon
We’re roommates.
51%
Flag icon
What’s a mahdda?
52%
Flag icon
Martyr.
52%
Flag icon
dyspepsia,
52%
Flag icon
I am an orphan of America.
52%
Flag icon
You wear snowshoes when the snow is deep and porous. The latticework within the snowshoe’s oval distributes the wearer’s weight over a wider area, in order to keep him or her from falling through the snow. So people, the connections between people, the people you know, become a sort of lattice, and the more people you know, and that know you, and know your situation and your story and your troubles or whatnot, the wider and stronger the lattice, and the less likely you are to—
58%
Flag icon
Richard Milhous Nixon,
63%
Flag icon
This is fiction now, it’s fucking fiction.
64%
Flag icon
I start wishing I had a pen, some paper. Details of all this will be good. This will make some kind of short story or something.
64%
Flag icon
But then it will sound like one of those things where the narrator, having grown up media-saturated, can’t live through anything without it having echoes of similar experiences in television, movies, books, blah blah.
65%
Flag icon
“Screw it, I’m not going to be a fucking anecdote in your stupid book.”
65%
Flag icon
“Listen, John—” “Who’s John?” “You’re John.” “I’m John?” “Yeah. I changed your name.” “Oh. Right. Now, why John again?”
67%
Flag icon
gravamen
70%
Flag icon
there is no logic to San Francisco generally, a city built with putty and pipe cleaners, rubber cement and colored construction paper.
75%
Flag icon
“You’re breaking out of character again.”
81%
Flag icon
I am misshapen
82%
Flag icon
the emotional equivalent of a drug binge,
84%
Flag icon
lamé,
« Prev 1