Punjab
Rate it:
Open Preview
Read between March 26 - April 21, 2020
47%
Flag icon
surmised,
47%
Flag icon
mutineers
47%
Flag icon
trudged
47%
Flag icon
‘cleave
47%
Flag icon
reconnoitring
47%
Flag icon
batteries
48%
Flag icon
cantonment
48%
Flag icon
‘Poorbeah
48%
Flag icon
Dinesh Kudtarkar
Killing by British
48%
Flag icon
flouted,
48%
Flag icon
Lord Palmerston, the British Prime Minister, had backed the demand.
48%
Flag icon
The line revealed the core of a firm new policy: separate Hindus from Muslims, and never again permit the two to join hands.
49%
Flag icon
Linked to Mangal Pandey, ‘Pandy’ was now the favoured British term for a sepoy. A few months later, writing to another English general, Mansfield, Lawrence repeated his worry:   In round numbers the Punjabi troops of various kinds cannot fall short of fifty thousand men!... If we allow the Punjabis to feel their strength, we may one day have as much trouble with them as with the Hindustanis.   Their use against surviving rebels, added Lawrence, called for astuteness.   I would leave… a greater proportion of Sikh cavalry in Rohilkund, where the people to guard against are Mohammedans, and take ...more
49%
Flag icon
In London, Parliament marked the British triumph by abolishing Company rule and asking Queen Victoria to assume the governance of India. In her name, Parliament and ministers would control India, where the Governor-General would henceforth be called Viceroy as well.
49%
Flag icon
imperialist
49%
Flag icon
antiquity
49%
Flag icon
promiscuously
51%
Flag icon
Thus the man with the biggest grant in the second canal colony, Sohag Para (located in Montgomery district), was Baba Khem Singh Bedi of Rawalpindi district, an eminent Sikh figure from Guru Nanak’s Bedi clan. He received several hundred squares in Sohag Para, amounting to no less than 7,798 acres.
51%
Flag icon
(peasants),
51%
Flag icon
(yeomen),
51%
Flag icon
The Raj’s answer to the scheme’s abuse was the Colonisation Bill of 1906, which empowered the provincial government to enforce its conditions of tenure in colony lands by summary or executive process, i.e. without initiating proceedings in civil courts. An uproar resulted. Throughout 1907, the Bill was assailed in a number of meetings held in the colonies and in Punjab’s journals, including the Tribune and the Zamindar of Lahore. Muslims, Sikhs and Hindus seemed united in their criticism.
51%
Flag icon
young Ajit Singh’s call to the Jat peasant to guard his honour, ‘Pagdi Sambhal, Jatta,’ evoked a popular response. It was also ‘the refrain of a song recited by Banke Dayal’ on this occasion.23 Ajit Singh and Lajpat Rai were both arrested and sent to Burma.
52%
Flag icon
proselytizing
52%
Flag icon
Anjuman-i-Islamia.
52%
Flag icon
Nirankari movement.
52%
Flag icon
Dinesh Kudtarkar
First communal blow
52%
Flag icon
Published in Hindi in 1875, his Satyarth Prakash (Light on the Meaning of Truth) had urged Hindus to return to ‘the pure monotheism’ of the Vedas. The book had also criticized Christianity, Islam, idolatrous or corrupted Hinduism, and Sikhism. The Swami’s other views are also of interest. He advocated a woman’s right to read scripture and educate herself, opposed untouchability, and held that Europe owed its technological and scientific success not to Christianity but to India’s ancient ‘Aryas’; in the modern age, however, Indians should learn from European virtues and achievements.
52%
Flag icon
vituperative
52%
Flag icon
the Raj took comfort from the fact that Muslims, Hindus and Sikhs were not thinking of a common platform.
53%
Flag icon
luminary
53%
Flag icon
schisms
53%
Flag icon
Rudyard Kipling
54%
Flag icon
preachers
54%
Flag icon
spurned
54%
Flag icon
In 1881 in Multan, a Hindu demand for a total ban on cow-slaughter coincided with a controversial plan to elevate the spire of Multan’s Prahladpuri temple. Though a minority, Multan’s Hindus were being assertive. A butcher and two mosques were attacked but retaliation destroyed or damaged twenty-three Hindu temples. In protest, Hindus suspended all trade for a few days.
54%
Flag icon
However, commotions died down fairly quickly and normal life returned. Also, ‘there were instances of mutual help and cooperation’. In September 1883, Hindu and Muslim leaders in Hoshiarpur jointly appealed for cooperation at a large public meeting chaired by a Christian. Three years later, in Ferozepore, ‘a number of Muslims contributed subscriptions for a Ram Lila procession’ and ‘on the whole supported the Hindus’ campaign against the opening of beef shops in the city’. Hindus attended Muharram congregations in Lahore, and in the 1893 Isa Khel disturbance ‘several Hindu shopkeepers ...more
54%
Flag icon
commotion.
56%
Flag icon
appeased.
57%
Flag icon
Dinesh Kudtarkar
Good thinker
59%
Flag icon
exertions
60%
Flag icon
revulsion.
Dinesh Kudtarkar
Jungle book writer appreciating massacre
60%
Flag icon
Desirous
60%
Flag icon
deplored
60%
Flag icon
Dinesh Kudtarkar
Jolt
61%
Flag icon
Hunter Committee on the Punjab events. Although Dyer was held guilty of ‘a grave error of judgment’, the report offered weak recommendations and exonerated O’Dwyer. Worse, the House of Lords gave Dyer a vote of approval and British admirers presented him with a sword of honour and 20,000 pounds.
61%
Flag icon
ascendancy,
61%
Flag icon
ferment
61%
Flag icon
galvanized
61%
Flag icon
A non-cooperating or prison-going Iqbal could have prevented this from happening, but he stayed out, as did Fazl-i-Husain. Despite energetic efforts, men like Zafar Ali and Kitchlew were unable to enthuse Muslim Punjab for Non-cooperation, which received an early blow in November 1920 when Fazl-i-Husain, who in the previous year had headed the Punjab Congress and the Punjab League, announced his intention to enter the new council.
61%
Flag icon
His rejection of Non-cooperation was a coup for the Raj.