The Harvard Classics in a Year: A Liberal Education in 365 Days
Rate it:
Open Preview
19%
Flag icon
coxcomb
19%
Flag icon
pedantry
19%
Flag icon
Gain Gleaned from Suffering Ralph Waldo Emerson. (1803–1882).  Essays and English Traits.
19%
Flag icon
Their daily life gives it the lie. Every ingenuous and aspiring soul leaves the doctrine behind him in his own experience, and all men feel sometimes the falsehood which they cannot demonstrate. For men are wiser than they know. That which they hear in schools and pulpits without afterthought, if said in conversation would probably be questioned in silence. If a man dogmatize in a mixed company on Providence and the divine laws, he is answered by a silence which conveys well enough to an observer the dissatisfaction of the hearer, but his incapacity to make his own statement.
19%
Flag icon
Every faculty which is a receiver of pleasure has an equal penalty put on its abuse. It is to answer for its moderation with its life. For every grain of wit there is a grain of folly. For every thing you have missed, you have gained something else; and for every thing you gain, you lose something. If riches increase, they are increased that use them. If the gatherer gathers too much, nature takes out of the man what she puts into his chest; swells the estate, but kills the owner.
19%
Flag icon
morose
19%
Flag icon
He who by force of will or of thought is great and overlooks thousands, has the responsibility of overlooking.
19%
Flag icon
baulked
19%
Flag icon
Luis Fernando Jaramillo
As says Rousseau. We are restricted by society's notions, perceptions and schemas.
19%
Flag icon
hindrances,
20%
Flag icon
That soul which within us is a sentiment, outside of us is a law. We feel its inspirations; out there in history we can see its fatal strength.
20%
Flag icon
Take what figure you will, its exact value, nor more nor less, still returns to you. Every secret is told, every crime is punished, every virtue rewarded, every wrong redressed, in silence and certainty.
20%
Flag icon
The ingenuity of man has been dedicated to the solution of one problem,—how to detach the sensual sweet, the sensual strong, the sensual bright, etc., from the moral sweet, the moral deep, the moral fair;
20%
Flag icon
  Life invests itself with inevitable conditions, which the unwise seek to dodge, which one and another brags that he does not know, brags that they do not touch him;—but the brag is on his lips, the conditions are in his soul. If he escapes them in one part they attack him in another more vital part. If he has escaped them in form and in the appearance, it is because he has resisted his life and fled from himself, and the retribution is so much death.
20%
Flag icon
Of all the gods, I only know the keys That ope the solid doors within whose vaults His thunders sleep.
Luis Fernando Jaramillo
"There is a crack in everything that god has made"
24%
Flag icon
When Is a Lie Not a Lie? Robert Louis Stevenson. Truth of Intercourse
24%
Flag icon
The habitual liar may be a very honest fellow, and live truly with his wife and friends; while another man who never told a formal falsehood in his life may yet be himself one lie-heart and face, from top to bottom. This is the kind of lie which poisons intimacy. And, vice versâ, veracity to sentiment, truth in a relation, truth to your own heart and your friends, never to feign or falsify emotion—that is the truth which makes love possible and mankind happy.
24%
Flag icon
The difficulty of literature is not to write, but to write what you mean; not to affect your reader, but to affect him precisely as you wish.
24%
Flag icon
And what is the result? That the one can open himself more clearly to his friends, and can enjoy more of what makes life truly valuable—intimacy with those he loves.
24%
Flag icon
If the injured one could read your heart, you may be sure that he would understand and pardon; but, alas! the heart cannot be shown—it has to be demonstrated in words. Do you think it is a hard thing to write poetry? Why, that is to write poetry, and of a high, if not the highest, order.
24%
Flag icon
  Pitiful is the case of the blind, who cannot read the face; pitiful that of the deaf, who cannot follow the changes of the voice. And there are others also to be pitied; for there are some of an inert, uneloquent nature, who have been denied all the symbols of communication, who have neither a lively play of facial expression, nor speaking gestures, nor a responsive voice, nor yet the gift of frank, explanatory speech: people truly made of clay, people tied for life into a bag which no one can undo. They are poorer than the gipsy, for their heart can speak no language
24%
Flag icon
misanthrope;
24%
Flag icon
prolegomenous
24%
Flag icon
Why, how can it be? It is eternally different; and yet you are still the friend of my heart.
24%
Flag icon
diffidence,
24%
Flag icon
“two to speak truth—one to speak and another to hear.”
26%
Flag icon
You and Your Dreams Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679).  Of Man, Being the First Part of Leviathan.
26%
Flag icon
  ‘Much memory, or memory of many things, is called experience.’ Again, imagination being only of those things which have been formerly perceived by sense, either all at once or by parts at several times, the former, which is the imagining the whole object as it was presented to the sense, is ‘simple’ imagination, as when one imagineth a man, or horse, which he hath seen before.
26%
Flag icon
waking I often observe the absurdity of dreams, but never dream of the absurdities of my waking thoughts, I am well satisfied, that, being awake, I know I dream not, though when I dream I think myself awake.
26%
Flag icon
knavery
26%
Flag icon
it is the part of a wise man to believe them no farther than right reason makes that which they say appear credible.
26%
Flag icon
‘mental discourse.’
26%
Flag icon
For in a discourse of our present civil war, what could seem more impertinent than to ask, as one did, what was the value of a Roman penny. Yet the coherence to me was manifest enough. For the thought of the war introduced the thought of the delivering up the king to his enemies; the thought of that brought in the thought of the delivering up of Christ; and that again the thought of the thirty pence, which was the price of that treason; and thence easily followed that malicious question; and all this in a moment of time—for thought is quick.
26%
Flag icon
  Whatsoever we imagine is ‘finite.’ Therefore there is no idea or conception of any thing we call ‘infinite.’ No man can have in his mind an image of infinite magnitude, nor conceive infinite swiftness, infinite time, or infinite force, or infinite power. When we say anything is infinite, we signify only that we are not able to conceive the ends and bounds of the things named; having no conception of the thing, but of our own inability. And therefore the name of God is used, not to make us conceive Him, for He is incomprehensible, and His greatness and power are unconceivable; but that we may ...more
26%
Flag icon
Who Is Bad? Marcus Aurelius Antoninus. (121–180).  The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius.
26%
Flag icon
every man is worth just so much as the things are worth about which he busies himself.
26%
Flag icon
Is any man afraid of change? Why, what can take place without change? What then is more pleasing or more suitable to the universal nature? And canst thou take a bath unless the wood undergoes a change? And canst thou be nourished unless the food undergoes a change? And can anything else that is useful be accomplished without change? Dost thou not see then that for thyself also to change is just the same, and equally necessary for the universal nature?
26%
Flag icon
comeliness
26%
Flag icon
From Plato: the man who has an elevated mind and takes a view of all time and of all substance, dost thou suppose it possible for him to think that human life is anything great? It is not possible, he said. Such a man then will think that death also is no evil. Certainly not.
27%
Flag icon
Constantly observe who those are whose approbation thou wishest to have, and what ruling principles they possess. For then thou wilt neither blame those who offend involuntarily, nor wilt thou want their approbation, if thou lookest to the sources of their opinions and appetites.
28%
Flag icon
The Perfect Argument George Berkeley (1685–1753).  Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous in Opposition to Sceptics and Atheists.
28%
Flag icon
To me it is evident for the reasons you allow of, that sensible things cannot exist otherwise than in a mind or spirit. Whence I conclude, not that they have no real existence, but that, seeing they depend not on my thought, and have all existence distinct from being perceived by me, there must be some other Mind wherein they exist. As sure, therefore, as the sensible world really exists, so sure is there an infinite omnipresent Spirit who contains and supports it.
28%
Flag icon
contrivance,
28%
Flag icon
the sensible world is that which we perceive by our several senses; and that nothing is perceived by the senses beside ideas; and that no idea or archetype of an idea can exist otherwise than in a mind.
28%
Flag icon
Few men think; yet all have opinions. Hence men’s opinions are superficial and confused.
28%
Flag icon
Malebranche;
28%
Flag icon
It is evident that the things I perceive are my own ideas, and that no idea can exist unless it be in a mind: nor is it less plain that these ideas or things by me perceived, either themselves of their archetypes, exist independently of my mind, since I know myself not to be their author, it being out of my power to determine at pleasure what particular ideas I shall be affected with upon opening my eyes or ears: they must therefore exist in some other Mind, whose Will it is they should be exhibited to me. The things, I say, immediately perceived are ideas or sensations, call them which you ...more
28%
Flag icon
there is a Mind which affects me every moment with all the sensible impressions I perceive.
28%
Flag icon
volition:
31%
Flag icon
You say to yourself that the work before you is not of its own creation. It is simply a mold like a fossil shell, an imprint similar to one of those forms embedded in a stone by an animal which once lived and perished. Beneath the shell was an animal and behind the document there was a man. Why do you study the shell unless to form some idea of the animal? In the same way do you study the document in order to comprehend the man;