Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge
Rate it:
Open Preview
Read between March 19 - March 28, 2018
74%
Flag icon
wherein personal decisions feel good and true.
74%
Flag icon
“Nor is science the enemy.
74%
Flag icon
For more than a thousand generations they have increased the survival and reproductive success of those who conformed to tribal faiths.
74%
Flag icon
Indoctrinability
74%
Flag icon
instinct.
74%
Flag icon
by consensus under the guidance of the innate rules of m...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
74%
Flag icon
Ethical and religious beliefs are created from the bottom up, from people to their culture.
74%
Flag icon
gross insufficiency of knowledge needed to judge the full consequences of our moral decisions, especially for the long term, say a decade or more. We have learned a great deal about ourselves and the world in which we live, but need a great deal more to be fully wise. There is a temptation at
74%
Flag icon
People need more than reason. They need the poetry of affirmation, they crave an authority greater than themselves at rites of passage and other moments of high seriousness. A majority desperately wish for the immortality the rituals seem to underwrite.
74%
Flag icon
surrender the precious self and
74%
Flag icon
A Treatise of Human Nature
74%
Flag icon
The Descent of Man
74%
Flag icon
Immanuel Kant, judged by history the greatest of secular philosophers, addressed moral reasoning very much as a theologian. Human beings, he argued, are independent moral agents with a wholly free will capable of obeying or breaking
74%
Flag icon
minds are subject to a categorical imperative,
74%
Flag icon
of what our actions ought to be.
74%
Flag icon
Nature, Kant said, is a system of cause and effect,
74%
Flag icon
moral choice is a matter of free will, for which there is no cause and effect. In making moral choices, in
74%
Flag icon
Sometimes a concept is baffling not because it is profound but because it is wrong. It does not accord, we know now, with the evidence of how the brain works.
74%
Flag icon
Moral reasoning in his view cannot dip into psychology and the social sciences in order to locate ethical principles, because they yield only a causal picture and fail to illuminate the basis of moral justification.
74%
Flag icon
road. He offered the very plausible premise that justice be defined as fairness,
75%
Flag icon
Ethicists don’t need that kind of information. You really can’t pass from is to ought.
75%
Flag icon
a genetic predisposition and suppose that because it is part of human nature, it is somehow transformed into an ethical precept.
75%
Flag icon
be physical products of the brain and culture.
75%
Flag icon
Adultery not only causes feelings of guilt, it is generally disapproved of by society, so these are other reasons to avoid
75%
Flag icon
There is a supreme principle,
75%
Flag icon
and its officials may do.” Rawls would point us toward egalitarianism
75%
Flag icon
The individual is seen as predisposed biologically to make certain choices.
75%
Flag icon
a belief in the command of God or the natural order of the universe.
75%
Flag icon
The naturalistic fallacy
75%
Flag icon
Most agree that ethical codes have arisen by evolution through the interplay of biology and culture.
75%
Flag icon
sciences, subject to judgment according to their consequences.
75%
Flag icon
dynamic relation between cooperation and defection.
76%
Flag icon
empathy to the distress of others and certain processes of attachment between infants and their caregivers.
76%
Flag icon
Such a process repeated through thousands of generations inevitably gave birth to the moral sentiments.
76%
Flag icon
xenophobia.
76%
Flag icon
The complementary instincts of morality and tribalism are easily manipulated.
76%
Flag icon
labor was finely divided as a growing minority of the populace specialized as craftsmen, traders, and soldiers.
76%
Flag icon
hierarchical.
76%
Flag icon
always to the advantage of the ruling classes.
76%
Flag icon
About this time the idea of law-giving gods originated. Their commands lent the ethical codes overpowering authority, once again—no surprise—to the favor of the rulers.
76%
Flag icon
who have evidently never given thought to the evolutionary origin and material functioning of the human brain.
76%
Flag icon
the innate epigenetic rules of moral reasoning will probably not prove to be aggregated into simple instincts such as bonding, cooperativeness, or altruism. Instead, the rules most probably will turn out to be an ensemble of many algorithms whose interlocking activities guide the mind across a landscape of nuanced moods and choices. Such a prestructured mental world may at first seem too complicated
76%
Flag icon
instinctual algorithms,
76%
Flag icon
Paleolithic egalitarian and tribalistic instincts are still firmly installed.
76%
Flag icon
As part of the genetic foundation of human nature, they cannot be replaced.
76%
Flag icon
they are not yet in the genes.
76%
Flag icon
produce cause-and-effect predictions and sound judgments based on them.
76%
Flag icon
From a convergence of these several approaches, the true origin and meaning of ethical behavior may come into focus.
77%
Flag icon
Religions are analogous to superorganisms.
77%
Flag icon
They express a primary rule of human existence, that whatever is necessary to sustain life is also ultimately biological.