Dataclysm: Who We Are (When We Think No One’s Looking)
Rate it:
Open Preview
11%
Flag icon
“Beauty is looks you can never forget. A face should jolt, not soothe.”
11%
Flag icon
He’s completely correct, for as with music, as with movies, and as with a wide variety of human phenomena: a flaw is a powerful thing.
11%
Flag icon
to be universally liked is to be relat...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
12%
Flag icon
I bet she doesn’t meet many guys who think she’s awesome. In fact, I’m actually into her for her quirks, not in spite of them. This is my diamond in the rough,
13%
Flag icon
Social psychologists call it the “pratfall effect”—as long as you’re generally competent, making a small, occasional mistake makes people think you’re more competent.
17%
Flag icon
I found it took the sender 73 minutes and 41 seconds to hammer out those 5,979 characters of hello—his final message was about as long as four pages in this book. He did not get a reply. Neither did the gentleman sender of B, who wins the Raymond Carver award for labor-intensive brevity. He took 387 keystrokes to get to “Hey.”
17%
Flag icon
Sitewide, the copy-and-paste strategy underperforms from-scratch messaging by about 25 percent, but in terms of effort-in to results-out it always wins:
18%
Flag icon
A major drawback to data from dating sites is that it tells you next to nothing about people actually going on dates. Once people are together in person, they don’t need messages or ratings or any of that. It’s an irony both in the data set and in the job itself—you do it right and the customers leave. In pairs, no less!
19%
Flag icon
that it’s the people you don’t know very well in your life who help ideas, especially new ones, spread.
21%
Flag icon
“I don’t like the dinosaur in this graphic. It looks too fake. Use a real photo of a dinosaur instead.”
21%
Flag icon
But by far the biggest cause of frustration is that people don’t understand and can’t articulate what they actually need.
22%
Flag icon
In short, people appear to be heavily preselecting online for something that, once they sit down in person, doesn’t seem important to them.
22%
Flag icon
You know what the difference between Tylenol and Kroger’s store-brand acetaminophen is? The box. Unless you take medicine like a king snake and plan to just swallow the package whole, there’s really no reason to pay twice as much for the “name” molecules, whose properties are determined by immutable chemical law.
23%
Flag icon
People make choices from the information we provide because they can, not because they necessarily should.
23%
Flag icon
one user was judging another, both people involved were white. I had to make it that way, because when you’re looking at how two American strangers behave in a romantic context, race is the ultimate confounding factor.
25%
Flag icon
men tend to like women of their own race. Far more than that, though, they don’t like black women.
26%
Flag icon
For whatever reason, people don’t want their network along for online dating.
28%
Flag icon
Obasogie asserts that blind people’s attitudes on race reflect a lifetime of cultural absorption, as opposed to any visual reality.
29%
Flag icon
A 9.0 is intense, but a 10.0 can rupture the world. Or launch a thousand ships.
29%
Flag icon
In either case, the male candidates’ curves are a flat line—a man’s looks have no effect on his prospects—and the female graphs are exponential.
31%
Flag icon
It’s a social scientist’s curse—what you most want to get at is exactly what your subjects are most eager to hide.
32%
Flag icon
What a person searches for often gives you the person himself.
33%
Flag icon
The paper suggests that autocomplete will eventually perpetuate the stereotypes it should only reflect,
37%
Flag icon
Stories create status for those who share them, especially when they concern important individuals, because information about powerful people is a form of power itself.
38%
Flag icon
But armed insurgency is often preceded by unarmed unrest—which itself is often propagated, even coordinated, through social media.fn5 Those nascent movements, being digitized, have attracted the attention of researchers.
40%
Flag icon
In social science, knowledge, like water, often takes the shape of its vessel.
41%
Flag icon
Zipf’s law, an observed statistical property of language that, like so much of the best math, lies somewhere between miracle and coincidence.fn1 It states that in any large body of text, a word’s popularity (its place in the lexicon, with 1 being the highest ranking) multiplied by the number of times it shows up, is the same for every word in the text.
42%
Flag icon
“least Asian” things are all misspellings, working-class occupations, and other underachievements, like single fatherhood. And of course there’s “6'4.”
48%
Flag icon
Queens is both a half mile and a world away from Manhattan.
51%
Flag icon
The site itself is just a raw list of links submitted by the users, who vote, and comment, and comment on the comments, and modify, and repost all day long, in what feels like the world’s biggest group of friends sitting on the world’s longest couch.
52%
Flag icon
One label found in Egypt reads “finest oil of Tjehenu” beneath the royal emblem and a pictograph of a golden oil press.
54%
Flag icon
There were 300,890 people who reported over $1 million in income to the IRS in 2011. Right now there are 2,643 Twitter accounts with 1 million followers, worldwide.
57%
Flag icon
That’s what I always want to remember: it’s not numbers that will deny us our humanity; it’s the calculated decision to stop being human.
58%
Flag icon
But while Facebook does know a lot about you, it’s more like a “work friend”—for
60%
Flag icon
Take the profile photos on OkCupid. The better-looking a photo is, the better chance it has of being outdated. That is, people find that one “great picture” and just lock it in forever.
61%
Flag icon
How does anything ever become useful if it can’t be “acted on in advance of a demonstrated valid use”?