Roberto Rigolin F Lopes

8%
Flag icon
It might be a mistake to pause now and ask what these imaginaries really are. They had been described as “sophistic” by Italian mathematicians in the Renaissance; it was Descartes who dismissively first called them “imaginary.” Newton held them to be impossible, and Leibniz said that was an amphibian between being and not-being.
The Art of the Infinite: The Pleasures of Mathematics
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview