Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty
Rate it:
Open Preview
20%
Flag icon
At the turn of the fourteenth century, Europe had a feudal order, an organization of society that first emerged in Western Europe after the collapse of the Roman Empire.
20%
Flag icon
serfs,
20%
Flag icon
their lord, who was not just the landlord, but also the judge, jury, and police force.
20%
Flag icon
The massive scarcity of labor created by the plague shook the foundations of the feudal order.
20%
Flag icon
Statute of Laborers,
20%
Flag icon
tried to fix wages at the levels paid before
20%
Flag icon
punishment for leaving employment without permission
20%
Flag icon
In 1381 the Peasants’ Revolt
20%
Flag icon
Wat Tyler,
20%
Flag icon
inclusive labor market began to emerge in England, and wages rose.
20%
Flag icon
freedoms. But in the East, a more powerful contradictory logic was at work. Fewer people meant higher wages in an inclusive labor market. But this gave lords a greater incentive to keep the labor market extractive and the peasants servile.
20%
Flag icon
Eastern landlords started to take over large tracts of land and expand their holdings,
20%
Flag icon
The effects became especially clear after 1500, when Western Europe began to demand the agricultural goods, such as wheat, rye, and livestock, produced in the East.
20%
Flag icon
Second Serfdom,
20%
Flag icon
In Korczyn, Poland, all work for the lord in 1533 was paid. But by 1600 nearly half was unpaid forced labor. In 1500, workers in Mecklenberg, in eastern Germany, owed only a few days’ unpaid labor services a year. By 1550 it was one day a week, and by 1600, three days per week. Workers’ children had to work for the lord for free for several years. In Hungary, landlords took complete control of the land in 1514, legislating one day a week of unpaid labor services for each worker. In 1550 this was raised to two days per week. By the end of the century, it was three days. Serfs subject to these ...more
20%
Flag icon
critical juncture, a major event or confluence of factors disrupting the existing economic or political balance in society.
20%
Flag icon
The culmination of the institutional struggles of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries were two landmark events: the English Civil War between 1642 and 1651, and particularly the Glorious Revolution of 1688.
20%
Flag icon
The Glorious Revolution
20%
Flag icon
As a consequence, economic institutions also started becoming more inclusive.
21%
Flag icon
the Industrial Revolution depended on major technological advances exploiting the knowledge base that had accumulated in Europe during the past centuries.
21%
Flag icon
The full force of this revolution came from the market that created profitable opportunities for technologies to be developed and applied.
21%
Flag icon
It also relied on education and skills,
21%
Flag icon
James Watt
21%
Flag icon
Richard Trevithick
21%
Flag icon
Richard Ar...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
21%
Flag icon
Isambard Kingdo...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
21%
Flag icon
First were political institutions, including a centralized state, that enabled her to take the next radical—in fact, unprecedented—step toward inclusive institutions with the onset of the Glorious Revolution.
21%
Flag icon
The events leading up to the Glorious Revolution forged a broad and powerful coalition able to place durable constraints on the power of the monarchy and the executive,
21%
Flag icon
All were battling with assemblies of citizens—such as the Parliament in England, the Cortes in Spain, and the Estates-General in France—that were demanding more rights and control over the monarchy.
21%
Flag icon
Elizabeth I was far less financially independent,
21%
Flag icon
it was only after 1600 that a huge expansion of world trade, particularly in the Atlantic, started to take place.
21%
Flag icon
England, Atlantic trade and colonization started creating a large group of wealthy traders with few links to the Crown,
21%
Flag icon
Fronde Rebellion between 1648 and 1652.
21%
Flag icon
the opponents to absolutism would prevail because they were relatively wealthy and more numerous than the opponents to absolutism in Spain and France.
21%
Flag icon
critical junctures are important because there are formidable barriers against gradual improvements,
21%
Flag icon
Once a critical juncture happens, the small differences that matter are the initial institutional differences that put in motion very different responses.
21%
Flag icon
matter. The kingdom of Poland-Lithuania, for example, was ruled by an elite class called the
21%
Flag icon
Szlachta,
21%
Flag icon
Russian emperor Peter the Great was also consolidating an absolutism far more intense and extractive than even Louis XIV could manage.
22%
Flag icon
But where do the small institutional differences that start this process of divergence arise in the first place?
22%
Flag icon
even societies that are far less complex than our modern society create political and economic institutions that have powerful effects on the lives of their members.
22%
Flag icon
These differences are often small to start with, but they cumulate, creating a process of institutional drift.
22%
Flag icon
institutional drift
22%
Flag icon
The richly divergent patterns of economic development around the world hinge on the interplay of critical junctures and institutional drift.
22%
Flag icon
Because in 1346 in Western Europe peasants had more power and autonomy than they did in Eastern Europe, the Black Death led to the dissolution of feudalism in the West and the Second Serfdom in the East. Because Eastern and Western Europe had started to diverge in the fourteenth century, the new economic opportunities of the seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth centuries would also have fundamentally different implications for these different parts of Europe. Because in 1600 the grip of the Crown was
22%
Flag icon
weaker in England than in France and Spain, Atlantic trade opened the way to the creation of new institutions with greater pluralism in England, while strengthening the French and Spanish monarchs.
22%
Flag icon
The outcome, however, is not historically predetermined but contingent.
22%
Flag icon
The victory of the winning groups was inexorably linked to the critical juncture created by the rise of Atlantic trade that enriched and emboldened merchants opposing the Crown.
22%
Flag icon
Bad weather and strategic mistakes by Sidonia, who had been put in charge at the last minute after a more experienced commander died, made the Spanish Armada lose their advantage.
22%
Flag icon
Against all odds, the English destroyed much of the fleet of their more powerful opponents. The Atlantic seas were now open to the English on more equal terms.
1 6 23