Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty
Rate it:
Open Preview
38%
Flag icon
emerging pluralistic nature of political institutions.
38%
Flag icon
But since England was far from being a democracy in this period, this access provided only a modest amount of responsiveness.
38%
Flag icon
Anybody could petition Parliament, and petition they did. Significantly, when people petitioned, Parliament listened.
38%
Flag icon
The Long Parliament abolished all the domestic monopolies that so impinged on people’s lives.
38%
Flag icon
Royal African Company,
38%
Flag icon
Chief Justice Holt
38%
Flag icon
So Holt pushed all future monopolies, not just of the Royal Africa Company, into the hands of Parliament.
38%
Flag icon
One hundred and thirty-five came from interlopers demanding free access to trade in the Atlantic.
38%
Flag icon
1698, when the Royal African Company monopoly was abolished.
38%
Flag icon
Property rights eroded under the Stuarts were strengthened. Parliament began a process of reform in economic institutions to promote manufacturing, rather than taxing and impeding it.
38%
Flag icon
Instead of taxing hearths, Parliament moved to start taxing land.
38%
Flag icon
whole series of acts and legislations that would expand the market and the profitability of woolen textiles was passed.
38%
Flag icon
Parliament also passed legislation that allowed for a complete reorganization of property rights in land, permitting the consolidation and elimination of many archaic forms of property and user rights.
38%
Flag icon
reforming finance.
38%
Flag icon
the creation of the Bank of England in 1694,
38%
Flag icon
the early eighteenth century, loans would be available to everyone who could put up the necessary collateral.
38%
Flag icon
Parliament continued the process of political centralization
38%
Flag icon
the capability and capacity of the state increased
38%
Flag icon
linkages between political centralization and pluralism:
38%
Flag icon
The state started expanding,
38%
Flag icon
qualitative way the state functioned and the way those who controlled it and those who worked in it behaved.
38%
Flag icon
improve the ability to raise revenue through taxation,
39%
Flag icon
the excise tax system had very elaborate record keeping.
39%
Flag icon
This remarkable level of state supervision of society
39%
Flag icon
the state began to rely more on talent and less on political appointees,
39%
Flag icon
most significant area of innovation was the mechanization of textile production and the development of factories
39%
Flag icon
fundamental reorganization of economic
39%
Flag icon
institutions in favor of innovators and entrepreneurs, based on the emergence of more secure and efficient property rights.
39%
Flag icon
“transportation revolution,”
39%
Flag icon
Property rights were much more secure
39%
Flag icon
the reorganization of land that took place in the eighteenth century were parliamentary acts that changed the nature of property ownership.
39%
Flag icon
Many pieces of land were encumbered by numerous archaic forms of property rights and many cross-cutting claims.
39%
Flag icon
This reorganization of economic institutions also manifested itself in the emergence of an agenda to protect domestic textile production against foreign imports.
39%
Flag icon
East India Company,
39%
Flag icon
At this point the most important domestic manufacturers produced woolen textiles, but the producers of cotton cloths were becoming both more important economically and more powerful politically.
39%
Flag icon
“Sumptuary Laws,”
39%
Flag icon
It was now illegal to wear Asian silks and calicoes in England.
39%
Flag icon
After a long struggle, these loopholes, as the domestic woolen textile manufacturers viewed them, were closed by the Calicoe Act of 1721:
39%
Flag icon
the wool industry now turned to clamp down on linen.
39%
Flag icon
The Manchester Act of 1736 agreed that “great quantities of stuffs made from linen yarn and cotton wool have for several years past been manufactured, and have been printed and painted within this kingdom of Great Britain.”
39%
Flag icon
The Manchester Act was a significant victory for the nascent cotton manufacturers. But its historical and economic significance was in fact much greater.
39%
Flag icon
First, it demonstrated the limits of entry barriers that the pluralistic political institutions of parliamentary England would permit. Second, over the next half century, technological innovations in the manufacture of cotton cloth would play a central role in the Industrial Revolution and fundamentally transform society by introducing the factory system.
39%
Flag icon
Navigation Acts, the first of which was passed in 1651,
40%
Flag icon
By 1760 the combination of all these factors—improved and new property rights, improved infrastructure, a changed fiscal regime, greater access to finance, and aggressive protection of traders and manufacturers—was beginning to have an effect.
40%
Flag icon
steam engine that were a result of James Watt’s ideas in the 1760s.
40%
Flag icon
“sun and planets” gear system.
40%
Flag icon
Dionysius Papin,
40%
Flag icon
“steam digester”
40%
Flag icon
In metallurgy, key contributions were made in the 1780s by Henry Cort,
40%
Flag icon
dealing with impurities in iron, allowing for a much better quality wrought iron to be produced.
1 13 23