The Sacred Project of American Sociology
Rate it:
2%
Flag icon
forbidden to be violated,
2%
Flag icon
They are reverenced, venerated, and defended as sacrosanct by the social groups that hold them as sacred.
2%
Flag icon
beyond questioning or disrespect.
3%
Flag icon
Things sacred thus have particular powers to motivate and direct human action on their behalf and for their protection.
13%
Flag icon
Cecil Greek, 1992, The Religious Roots of American Sociology, New York: Garland;
14%
Flag icon
Lasch 1991.
19%
Flag icon
Collectively, they are focused on threatening social problems (about which sociologists are the prophetic experts), injustices committed (about which sociologists are the whistle blowers),
19%
Flag icon
abuses by economically and politically (especially “neo-liberal”) powerful elites (ditto on whistle blowing), and mobilizing social and political movements for sociopolitical and economic change (about which sociologists are the scientific experts and cheerleaders).
82%
Flag icon
reporting back to those societies what really is going on in and among them, why and how so, and with what apparent consequences.
83%
Flag icon
openness, curiosity, humility, versatility, pluralism, and the ability to relate to a host of different kinds of people and groups.
87%
Flag icon
personalism insists on speaking of people as “persons” instead of “individuals,” because the former involves natural social ties and obligations while the latter suggests atomistic autonomy.
90%
Flag icon
For helpful analyses of the naturalistic approach to morality that personalism embraces and the differences between that and the approach to morality reflected in “public sociology,” see Phil Gorski, 2013, “Beyond the Fact/Value Distinction: Ethical Naturalism and the Social Sciences,” Society, September/October, 50(5), pp. 543–553; Christian Smith, 2013, “Comparing Ethical Naturalism and ‘Public Sociology,’” Society, September/October, 50(5), pp. 598–601.