Adam Glantz

1%
Flag icon
The point of the “without any gaps” approach is more to avoid skipping from highlight to highlight, the way a lot of university courses on history of philosophy have to do—where one jumps straight from, say, Aristotle to Descartes, vaulting over a gap of two thousand years or so. Rather, I want to show how each thinker built on those who came earlier, while also striking out in new directions.
Classical Philosophy (A History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps #1)
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview