“Yes, along with the argument that repeatability, as a burden of proof, is an unreasonably high bar when studying consciousness.
The endless stupidity. The bar is, and must always be, very high. The problem isn't the height, but what the bar represents within the given context. In this case it means these two morons actually need to define, and successfully jump, a never before seen bar at a, according to established science, world record height.
Why the hell am I giving this inept collection of words called a book even a second my time when getting punched in the nuts would be far more intellectually stimulating ?
