Ranas

57%
Flag icon
To be wrong about the fundamental problem of “man and woman”; on the one hand, to deny the most abysmal antagonism and the necessity of an eternally hostile tension; and, on the other hand, to dream, perhaps, of equal rights, equal education, equal entitlements and obligations: that is a typical sign of a shallow mind, and a thinker who has proven to be shallow in this dangerous area – shallow in instinct! –, can be generally regarded as suspicious, or, even more, as shown up for what he is, as exposed. He will probably be too “short” for all the fundamental questions of life, including future ...more
Ranas
😲😲😲😲 Nietzsche sees strictness with women as natural and essential CHATGPT In this passage, Nietzsche is addressing the topic of gender relations and the roles of men and women. Let's break it down: 1. **Shallow Thinking**: Nietzsche criticizes those who deny the deep differences and tensions he perceives between men and women. He regards the advocacy for equal rights, education, and obligations as a sign of superficial thinking. According to him, thinkers who hold such views lack depth in their understanding of human nature. 2. **Depth in Spirit and Desires**: Nietzsche suggests that a person who truly understands human nature will acknowledge a certain type of dynamic between men and women. He refers to this as thinking about women in an "oriental manner." Historically, in many Eastern societies, women were seen as possessions or entities to be controlled, and Nietzsche uses this as an example to illustrate his point. 3. **Historical Example of Greeks**: Nietzsche points to the ancient Greeks, particularly from the time of Homer to Pericles, as an example. As their culture grew and evolved, they became stricter with women, adopting an approach more reminiscent of their Eastern neighbors. He implies that this change was not only logical and necessary but also desirable. Overall, Nietzsche is arguing that any true, deep understanding of the nature of men and women would acknowledge the differences and tensions between them. He uses historical and cultural examples to bolster his argument, suggesting that societies that recognized these differences prospered. However, it's essential to approach Nietzsche's views with caution, as they are rooted in the specific cultural and historical contexts he lived in and can be quite controversial from a modern perspective.
Nietzsche: Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy)
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview