this is certainly not the case for the dual-aspect monism of Atmanspacher and Rickles, who often relate their model to earlier European philosophy, including here: “Over and above meaning as a subject-object relation, dual-aspect monism offers the option, contrary to Kant, of direct, immanent experiences of the psychophysically neutral reality, which avoids the problem of access to a transcendental realm. If this reality is primordial enough, like an Unus Mundus, it may be aligned with the ‘absolute’ and bring us back to Hegel. Immanent experiences refer to modes of knowledge and meaning that
...more
