Such a doubled conception of the Human as Two has major implications for how one thinks and imagines the entire spectrum of apparently anomalous phenomena—that is, how one thinks about all those semiotic or meaningful moments in which one-half of this Human as Two is trying to communicate with the other half in symbol, story, and vision or apparition. Such translations, after all, are seldom, if ever, transparent to the rational or egoic half of the human—to that part of us that seeks clarity, reason, and formula.
