The Retreat of Reason: Political Correctness and the Corruption of Public Debate in Modern Britain (Second Edition)
Rate it:
8%
Flag icon
Political correctness started as a study of cultural Marxism in Germany in the 1920s,
9%
Flag icon
Anything that is not PC is automatically controversial.
9%
Flag icon
replaced reason with emotion, subordinating objective truth to subjective virtue.
9%
Flag icon
become a hindrance to social progress, and a threat to society.
9%
Flag icon
By closing down debates, it restricts the ability of society to tackle the problems that face it.
11%
Flag icon
The Politically Correct are more intolerant of dissent than traditional liberals or even conservatives.
12%
Flag icon
Yet today, if you say the ‘wrong thing’, you suddenly have legal problems, political problems, you might even lose your job or be expelled from college.
12%
Flag icon
Certain topics are forbidden. You can’t approach the truth about a lot of different subjects. If you do, you are immediately branded as ‘racist’, ‘sexist’, ‘homophobic’, ‘insensitive’, or ‘judgmental.’
13%
Flag icon
Jeremy Stone
Definition
13%
Flag icon
Political correctness is an ideology that classifies certain groups of people as victims in need of protection from criticism, and which makes believers feel that no dissent
13%
Flag icon
should be tolerated.
15%
Flag icon
Rather than say I would like to hear your side, the politically correct insist: ‘you can’t say that’.
15%
Flag icon
Political correctness is the dictatorship of virtue.
Jeremy Stone
Political correctness is the dictatorship of virtue.
21%
Flag icon
(Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, all of whom were also white, is unthinkable nowadays.)
22%
Flag icon
Black History Month and Gay, Lesbian and Transgender History Month,
22%
Flag icon
Politically, it prefers government of the few, by the few and above all for the few.
47%
Flag icon
Free speech is never an absolute. From
47%
Flag icon
Speech should be curtailed only if it is intended and likely to cause physical violence, or gravely threatens national security,
47%
Flag icon
It has started criminalising speech that merely causes offence, or incites not violence but an emotion (hatred).
47%
Flag icon
A country that has long prided itself on its freedom of speech has been reduced by political correctness to a country where, despite endemic levels of violent crime, police spend time investigating and arresting leading writers and broadcasters for what they write and say.
49%
Flag icon
As a result, political correctness leads to a huge gulf between elites and commoners, between those who govern and those who are governed.
50%
Flag icon
In almost all western countries, political correctness has undermined democracy’s ability to reflect public concern on this issue.
50%
Flag icon
opposed to multiculturalism,
50%
Flag icon
low conviction rate,
50%
Flag icon
Being less affected by political correctness, and thus being able to think more logically, the general public are on many issues far wiser than their leaders.
51%
Flag icon
The closing down of political debate does not deal with problems, but allows them to fester and grow.
51%
Flag icon
If mainstream parties don’t address public concern, extremist parties, not worried about the pariah status of being politically incorrect,
51%
Flag icon
will step into the vacuum between the ruled and the rulers.
54%
Flag icon
There is a contradiction between the politically correct presumption at the national level that powers should be transferred downwards (i.e.
54%
Flag icon
devolved to the regions), but that at the continental level they should be transferred upwards (i.e. devolved to Brussels).
54%
Flag icon
Few things have done more in the history of humanity to improve human existence than capitalism.
56%
Flag icon
The purpose of all law and order policies is to provide justice (otherwise known as retribution), deterrence and rehabilitation.
56%
Flag icon
in 1954 for every three robbers convicted, one was sent to jail, a ratio of 1:3. By 2002, this ratio was 1:22. For burglars, the ratio was 1:18 in 1954 compared with 1:59
56%
Flag icon
The rise in crime over the last 50 years has matched the decline in chance of being sent to prison.
56%
Flag icon
com­mitting crime far more attractive by tipping the balance from risk to reward.
59%
Flag icon
The simple fact, awkward as it is for the politically correct, is that Britain doesn’t face the threat of mass terror­ism from militant Hindus. Britain faces a very signif­icant threat of a large-scale terrorist attack perpet­uated by Muslims in the
59%
Flag icon
name of Islam, but an insig­nificant threat of terrorism from any other religious group (even Northern Irish Catholics by comparison).
60%
Flag icon
positive discrimination,
71%
Flag icon
The state should not try to censor or criminalise any speech unless it is a direct incitement to violence and there is a likelihood that violence will occur as a result.
72%
Flag icon
Finally, Western minds may be free again to reason rather than just emote, to pursue objective truth rather than subjective virtue.
72%
Flag icon
Nothing and no one is immune from criticism.
72%
Flag icon
It is possible to separate liberalism from dogmatism, to give up political correctness and take up factual correctness, but it can take a personal effort.
75%
Flag icon
ad hominem
79%
Flag icon
principle behind PC is benevolent, in encouraging us to see the best in those who are different from us,
79%
Flag icon
The pity is that this aim should have become an unacceptable form of policing that has poisoned public debate and made us fools, lest the uncomfortable facts that muddy the clear waters of this
79%
Flag icon
principle make anyone think that we do not hold it dear.51