Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind
Rate it:
Open Preview
Read between May 18, 2019 - January 11, 2020
53%
Flag icon
Being Scots, they were practical types. So they contacted a professor of mathematics from the University of Edinburgh, Colin Maclaurin. The three of them collected data on the ages at which people died and used these to calculate how many ministers were likely to pass away in any given year.
54%
Flag icon
Second-year psychology students must take ‘Statistical Methods in Psychological Research’. Confucius, Buddha, Jesus and Muhammad would have been bewildered if you told them that in order to understand the human mind and cure its illnesses you must first study statistics.
54%
Flag icon
Knowledge is Power
54%
Flag icon
The real test of ‘knowledge’ is not whether it is true, but whether it empowers us.
54%
Flag icon
Scientists usually assume that no theory is 100 per cent correct. Consequently, truth is a poor test for knowledge. The real test is utility.
54%
Flag icon
A theory that enables us to do new things constitutes knowledge....
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
55%
Flag icon
Americans believe that the solution to terrorism is technological rather than political.
55%
Flag icon
Until the Scientific Revolution most human cultures did not believe in progress.
55%
Flag icon
If even Muhammad, Jesus, Buddha and Confucius – who knew everything there is to know – were unable to abolish famine, disease, poverty and war from the world, how could we expect to do so?
55%
Flag icon
could overcome any and every problem by acquiring and applying new knowledge. Poverty, sickness, wars, famines, old age and death itself were not the inevitable fate of humankind. They were simply the fruits of our ignorance.
57%
Flag icon
Scientists themselves are not always aware of the political, economic and religious interests that control the flow of money; many scientists do, in fact, act out of pure intellectual curiosity. However, only rarely do scientists dictate the scientific agenda.
57%
Flag icon
Even if we wanted to finance pure science unaffected by political, economic or religious interests, it would probably be impossible.
57%
Flag icon
There is no scientific answer to this question. There are only political, economic and religious answers. In today’s world, it is obvious that Slughorn has a better chance of getting the money. Not because udder diseases are scientifically more interesting than bovine mentality, but because the dairy industry, which stands to benefit from the research, has more political and economic clout than the animal-rights lobby.
57%
Flag icon
Perhaps in a strict Hindu society, where cows are sacred, or in a society committed to animal rights, Professor Sprout would have a better shot. But as long as she lives in a society that values the commercial potential of milk and the health of its human citizens over the feelings of cows, she’d best write up her research proposal so as to appeal to those assumptions.
58%
Flag icon
Some of the last survivors were hounded into an evangelical concentration camp, where well-meaning but not particularly open-minded missionaries tried to indoctrinate them in the ways of the modern world. The Tasmanians were instructed in reading and writing, Christianity and various ‘productive skills’ such as sewing clothes and farming. But they refused to learn. They became ever more melancholic, stopped having children, lost all interest in life, and finally chose the only escape route from the modern world of science and progress – death.
58%
Flag icon
Europeans managed to conquer America and gain supremacy at sea mainly because the Asiatic powers showed little interest in them.
59%
Flag icon
So it is hardly coincidental that science and capitalism form the most important legacy that European imperialism has bequeathed the post-European world of the twenty-first century. Europe and Europeans no longer rule the world, but science and capital are growing ever stronger. The victories of capitalism are examined in the following chapter.
61%
Flag icon
Zheng He explored the oceans, and assisted pro-Chinese rulers, but he did not try to conquer or colonise the countries he visited. Moreover, the expeditions of Zheng He were not deeply rooted in Chinese politics and culture.
61%
Flag icon
Most Chinese rulers left even nearby Japan to its own devices. There was nothing peculiar about that. The oddity is that early modern Europeans caught a fever that drove them to sail to distant and completely unknown lands full of alien cultures, take one step on to their beaches, and immediately declare, ‘I claim all these territories for my king!’
62%
Flag icon
When the Muslims conquered India, they did not bring along archaeologists to systematically study Indian history, anthropologists to study Indian cultures, geologists to study Indian soils, or zoologists to study Indian fauna. When the British conquered India, they did all of these things.
63%
Flag icon
They created the world as we know it, including the ideologies we use in order to judge them.
63%
Flag icon
Eventually, in the late twentieth century, just as the Western empires crumbled, racism became anathema among scientists and politicians alike. But the belief in Western superiority did not vanish. Instead, it took on new forms.
63%
Flag icon
Racism was replaced by culturism.
64%
Flag icon
We no longer say, ‘It’s in their blood.’ We say, ‘It’s in their culture.’
66%
Flag icon
but ultimately, it is the scientists who foot the bill.
69%
Flag icon
But in its extreme form, belief in the free market is as naïve as belief in Santa Claus. There simply is no such thing as a market free of all political bias.
69%
Flag icon
Most slaves lived a short and miserable life, and millions more died during wars waged to capture slaves or during the long voyage from inner Africa to the shores of America. All this so that Europeans could enjoy their sweet tea and candy – and sugar barons could enjoy huge profits.
69%
Flag icon
The slave trade was not controlled by any state or government. It was a purely economic enterprise, organised and financed by the free market according to the laws of supply and demand.
70%
Flag icon
Some religions, such as Christianity and Nazism, have killed millions out of burning hatred.
70%
Flag icon
between 1885 and 1908 the pursuit of growth and profits cost the lives of 6 million individuals (at least 20 per cent of the Congo’s population). Some estimates reach up to 10 million deaths.4
70%
Flag icon
In 8500 BC one could cry bitter tears over the Agricultural Revolution, but it was too late to give up agriculture. Similarly, we may not like capitalism, but we cannot live without it.
71%
Flag icon
Clearly the world does not lack energy. All we lack is the knowledge necessary to harness and convert it to our needs.
72%
Flag icon
Pigs are among the most intelligent and inquisitive of mammals, second perhaps only to the great apes.
72%
Flag icon
Many dairy cows live almost all their allotted years inside a small enclosure; standing, sitting and sleeping in their own urine and excrement.
72%
Flag icon
Again, it is fuelled by indifference. Most people who produce and consume eggs, milk and meat rarely stop to think about the fate of the chickens, cows or pigs whose flesh and emissions they are eating.
72%
Flag icon
Ironically, the same scientific disciplines which shape our milk machines and egg machines have lately demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt that mammals and birds have a complex sensory and emotional make-up. They not only feel physical pain, but can also suffer from emotional distress.
72%
Flag icon
This is the basic lesson of evolutionary psychology: a need shaped in the wild continues to be felt subjectively even if it is no longer really necessary for survival and reproduction.
72%
Flag icon
The tragedy of industrial agriculture is that it takes great care of the objective needs of animals, while neglecting their subjective needs.
73%
Flag icon
The conclusion was inescapable: monkeys must have psychological needs and desires that go beyond their material requirements, and if these are not fulfilled, they will suffer greatly.
73%
Flag icon
For the first time in human history, supply began to outstrip demand. And an entirely new problem was born: who is going to buy all this stuff?
73%
Flag icon
medieval Europe, aristocrats spent their money carelessly on extravagant luxuries, whereas peasants lived frugally, minding every penny.
73%
Flag icon
Today, the tables have turned. The rich take great care managing their assets and investments, while the less well heeled go into debt buying cars and televisions they don’t really need.
73%
Flag icon
The capitalist and consumerist ethics are two sides of the same coin, a merger of two commandments. The supreme commandment of the rich is ‘Invest!’ The supr...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
75%
Flag icon
from the earliest times, more than a million years ago, humans lived in small, intimate communities, most of whose members were kin. The Cognitive Revolution and the Agricultural Revolution did not change that.
75%
Flag icon
They glued together families and communities to create tribes, cities, kingdoms and empires, but families and communities remained the basic building blocks of all human societies.
75%
Flag icon
The Industrial Revolution, on the other hand, managed within little more than two centuries to break these building blocks into atoms. Most of the traditional functions of families and ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
75%
Flag icon
Romantic literature often presents the individual as somebody caught in a struggle against the state and the market.
76%
Flag icon
The Syrian, Lebanese, Jordanian and Iraqi nations are the product of haphazard borders drawn in the sand by French and British diplomats who ignored local history, geography and economy.
77%
Flag icon
in the year following the 9/11 attacks, despite all the talk of terrorism and war, the average person was more likely to kill himself than to be killed by a terrorist, a soldier or a drug dealer.
79%
Flag icon
Though citizens in Israel, Italy, Mexico or Thailand may harbour illusions of independence, the fact is that their governments cannot conduct independent economic or foreign policies, and they are certainly incapable of initiating and conducting full-scale war on their own.