Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind
Rate it:
Open Preview
Read between September 27 - December 6, 2020
2%
Flag icon
league. On the
3%
Flag icon
The first evidence for tool production dates from about 2.5 million years ago, and the manufacture and use of tools are the criteria by which archaeologists recognise ancient humans.
5%
Flag icon
The period from about 70,000 years ago to about 30,000 years ago witnessed the invention of boats, oil lamps, bows and arrows and needles (essential for sewing warm clothing). The first objects that can reliably be called art date from this era (see the Stadel lion-man), as does the first clear evidence for religion, commerce and social stratification.
5%
Flag icon
The appearance of new ways of thinking and communicating, between 70,000 and 30,000 years ago, constitutes the Cognitive Revolution.
5%
Flag icon
According to this theory Homo sapiens is primarily a social animal. Social cooperation is our key for survival and reproduction.
5%
Flag icon
The new linguistic skills that modern Sapiens acquired about seventy millennia ago enabled them to gossip for hours on end.
6%
Flag icon
Rumour-mongers are the original fourth estate, journalists who inform society about and thus protect it from cheats and freeloaders.
6%
Flag icon
As far as we know, only Sapiens can talk about entire kinds of entities that they have never seen, touched or smelled.
6%
Flag icon
The secret was probably the appearance of fiction. Large numbers of strangers can cooperate successfully by believing in common myths.
6%
Flag icon
There are no gods in the universe, no nations, no money, no human rights, no laws, and no justice outside the common imagination of human beings.
7%
Flag icon
Peugeot is a figment of our collective imagination.
7%
Flag icon
Such companies were legally independent of the people who set them up, or invested money in them, or managed them.
7%
Flag icon
It all revolved around telling stories, and convincing people to believe them.
7%
Flag icon
Telling effective stories is not easy. The difficulty lies not in telling the story, but in convincing everyone else to believe it.
7%
Flag icon
Unlike lying, an imagined reality is something that everyone believes in, and as long as this communal belief persists, the imagined reality exerts force in the world.
7%
Flag icon
Ever since the Cognitive Revolution, Sapiens have thus been living in a dual reality. On the one hand, the objective reality of rivers, trees and lions; and on the other hand, the imagined reality of gods, nations and corporations. As time went by, the imagined reality became ever more powerful, so that today the very survival of rivers, trees and lions depends on the grace of imagined entities such as the United States and Google.
8%
Flag icon
For similar reasons, archaic humans did not initiate any revolutions. As far as we can tell, changes in social patterns, the invention of new technologies and the settlement of alien habitats resulted from genetic mutations and environmental pressures more than from cultural initiatives.
8%
Flag icon
Sapiens could transform their social structures, the nature of their interpersonal relations, their economic activities and a host of other behaviours within a decade or two.
8%
Flag icon
The global trade network of today is based on our trust in such fictional entities as currencies, banks and corporations.
9%
Flag icon
The real difference between us and chimpanzees is the mythical glue that binds together large numbers of individuals, families
9%
Flag icon
and groups. This glue has made us the masters of creation.
9%
Flag icon
divorce, not to mention the cornucopia of psychological complexes from which both
12%
Flag icon
The generic rubric ‘theists’ covers Jewish rabbis from eighteenth-century Poland, witch-burning Puritans from seventeenth-century Massachusetts, Aztec priests from fifteenth-century Mexico, Sufi mystics from twelfth-century Iran, tenth-century Viking warriors, second-century Roman legionnaires, and first-century Chinese bureaucrats. Each of these viewed the others’ beliefs and practices as weird and heretical.
18%
Flag icon
This is the essence of the Agricultural Revolution: the ability to keep more people alive under worse conditions.
19%
Flag icon
The pursuit of an easier life resulted in much hardship, and not for the last time. It happens to us today. How many young college graduates have taken demanding jobs in high-powered firms, vowing that they will work hard to earn money that will enable them to retire and pursue their real interests when they are thirty-five? But by the time they reach that age, they have large mortgages, children to school, houses in the suburbs that necessitate at least two cars per family, and a sense that life is not worth living without really good wine and expensive holidays abroad.
19%
Flag icon
One of history’s few iron laws is that luxuries tend to become necessities and to spawn new obligations.
20%
Flag icon
Göbekli Tepe
21%
Flag icon
This discrepancy between evolutionary success and individual suffering is perhaps the most important lesson we can draw from the Agricultural Revolution.
23%
Flag icon
Hammurabi’s Code was based on the premise that if the king’s subjects all accepted their positions in the hierarchy and acted accordingly, the empire’s million inhabitants would be able to cooperate effectively. Their society could then produce enough food for its members, distribute it efficiently, protect itself against its enemies, and expand its territory so as to acquire more wealth and better security.
23%
Flag icon
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
23%
Flag icon
a reality governed by universal and immutable principles of justice, such as equality or hierarchy. Yet the only place where such universal principles exist is in the fertile imagination of Sapiens, and in the myths they invent and tell one another. These principles have no objective validity.
23%
Flag icon
myth. In what sense do all humans equal one another? Is there any objective reality, outside the human imagination, in which we are truly equal? Are all humans equal to one another biologically?
23%
Flag icon
According to the science of biology, people were not ‘created’. They have evolved. And they certainly did not evolve to be ‘equal’. The idea of equality is inextricably intertwined with the idea of creation. The Americans got the idea of equality from Christianity, which argues that every person has a divinely created soul, and that all souls are equal before God.
24%
Flag icon
‘equal’? Evolution is based on difference, not on equality. Every person carries a somewhat different genetic code, and is exposed from birth to different environmental influences. This leads to the development of different qualities that carry with them different chances of survival. ‘Created equal’ should therefore be translated into ‘evolved differently’.
24%
Flag icon
There is only a blind evolutionary process, devoid of any purpose, leading to the birth of individuals. ‘Endowed by their creator’ should be translated simply into ‘born’.
24%
Flag icon
Many of them undergo constant mutations, and may well be completely lost over time. The ostrich is a bird that lost its ability to fly. So ‘unalienable rights’ should be translated into ‘mutable characteristics’.
24%
Flag icon
Just like equality, rights and limited liability companies, liberty too is a political ideal rather than a biological phenomenon.
24%
Flag icon
‘We know that people are not equal biologically! But if we believe that we are all equal in essence, it will enable us to create a stable and prosperous society.’
24%
Flag icon
an imagined order is always in danger of collapse, because it depends upon myths, and myths vanish once people stop believing in them.
24%
Flag icon
Some of these efforts take the shape of violence and coercion.
24%
Flag icon
When, in 1860, a majority of American citizens concluded that African slaves are human beings and must therefore enjoy the right of liberty, it took a bloody civil war to make the southern states acquiesce.
24%
Flag icon
‘You can do many things with bayonets, but it is rather uncomfortable to sit on them.’ A
24%
Flag icon
Of all human collective activities, the one most difficult to
24%
Flag icon
organise is violence. To say that a social order is maintained by military force immediately raises the question: what maintains the military order? It is impossible to organise an army solely by coercion.
24%
Flag icon
It is quite common to argue that the elite may do so out of cynical greed.
25%
Flag icon
Romanticism, which encourages variety, meshes perfectly with consumerism. Their marriage has given birth to the infinite ‘market of experiences’, on which the modern tourism industry is founded. The tourism industry does not sell flight tickets and hotel bedrooms. It sells experiences.
25%
Flag icon
The inter-subjective is something that exists within the communication network linking the subjective consciousness of many individuals.
25%
Flag icon
law, money, gods, nations.
26%
Flag icon
change of such magnitude can be accomplished only with the help of a complex organisation, such as a political party, an ideological movement, or a religious cult. However, in order to establish such complex organisations, it’s necessary to convince many strangers to cooperate with one another. And this will happen only if these strangers believe in some shared myths. It follows that in order to change an existing imagined order, we must first believe in an alternative imagined order.
26%
Flag icon
ancient Sumerians, who lived in southern Mesopotamia.
« Prev 1 3