In his caustically grand way, Ahad Ha’am had a point about the content-free quality of Herzl’s notion of ‘Jewishness’ defined more by how the Gentiles felt, for ill or good, than by the core of Judaism itself. But the counterpoint is that for all his devotional eloquence and penetrating intellect, Ahad Ha’am also was unclear about what true Judaism was, for the simple reason that at least since Maimonides this had not been an agreed truism. It was not pure Torah or the Karaites would be right. It was not unexamined Talmud (not that that was a monolithic work) or Maimonides would be wrong. It
...more