xGenius: Expected Goals and the Science of Winning Football Matches
Rate it:
Kindle Notes & Highlights
16%
Flag icon
Arno Michels
16%
Flag icon
Rainer Schrey,
16%
Flag icon
Ralph Hasenhüttl
20%
Flag icon
Henry first learned how to exploit market inefficiencies by trading corn and soybean futures
20%
Flag icon
Tom Werner,
21%
Flag icon
Michael Edwards, the Director of Technical Performance.
21%
Flag icon
Ian Graham came knocking. The team’s Director of Research
22%
Flag icon
In that game against Mainz, Ian Graham’s printouts demonstrated that Dortmund took 19 shots compared to their opponent’s 10. They worked the ball into Mainz’s penalty area on an impressive 36 occasions; their opposition managed only 17. Dortmund missed a penalty in the 70th minute, only to score an own goal four minutes later. Overall, Dortmund created 2.13(xG) to Mainz’s 0.93(xG). Based on these xG figures, there was only a 10 per cent chance that Dortmund would lose this game. They dominated by every conceivable measure, except the final score.
22%
Flag icon
Barry Hunter,
22%
Flag icon
who was installed in Liverpool’s scouting department.
22%
Flag icon
Another key cog in the Liverpool backroom staff was Michael Edwards,
22%
Flag icon
analyst for Prozone, a budding football data company. The business operated
32%
Flag icon
Deepak Ravindran and his wife Emilie Vanpoperinghe
32%
Flag icon
Dr Ian Graham, former Director of Research at Liverpool
34%
Flag icon
Michu fell victim to what is known as ‘regression to the mean,’ another statistical phenomenon which originated with Francis Galton.
40%
Flag icon
The key is to find the misshapen fruit.
40%
Flag icon
Starlizard, Smartodds and consultancies such as Twenty First Group
48%
Flag icon
The professional poker player Caspar Berry argued, ‘Whenever someone innovates in business or in life, they almost inevitably do so by accepting a negative metric that other people are unwilling to accept.’
48%
Flag icon
ShotQuality is a basketball analytics consultancy which helps teams gain a competitive advantage by providing cutting-edge insight into, well, shot quality.
48%
Flag icon
Simon Gerszberg, the founder and CEO of ShotQuality, was first introduced to this xG way of thinking at Colgate University. Dave Klatsky
50%
Flag icon
The nearer to goal, the better: This one is obvious, and we’ve already seen how it’s affected the shooting distance of teams over the decade following the advent of xG. The more central, the better: Shots from the central part of the penalty area are more valuable than those from tighter angles. Feet are better than heads: All other things being equal, shots taken with feet are much more likely to result in goals than headed shots. Crosses are hard: In general, crosses are more difficult to convert than ground passes, through-balls, and shots after dribbles. The clearer the sight of goal, the ...more
50%
Flag icon
The shot maps for Brentford strikers over the last decade or so generally show a cluster of shots in and around the six-yard box, with only a handful taking place from outside the box.
53%
Flag icon
William the Conqueror.
68%
Flag icon
it doesn’t tell us a great deal about how the ball arrived at these dangerous positions in the first place. This is what xThreat seeks to do.
68%
Flag icon
A player making a pass from F4 (0.01) into G10 (0.03) has increased his team’s chances of scoring by 2 per cent - or 0.02(xT).
68%
Flag icon
player successfully dribbling the ball from C10 (0.03) to D11 (0.14) has increased his team’s chances of scoring by 0.11(xT).