Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain
Rate it:
Open Preview
Read between December 23, 2023 - January 5, 2024
65%
Flag icon
two conditions
65%
Flag icon
what drives basic attention and working memory? The answer can only be basic value, the collection of basic preferences inherent in biological regulation.
65%
Flag icon
the full somatic-marker hypothesis,
65%
Flag icon
allocation and maintenance of attention and working memory
65%
Flag icon
motivated by preferences inherent in the organism,
65%
Flag icon
BIASES AND THE CREATION OF ORDER
65%
Flag icon
automated somatic states, with their biasing mechanisms; working memory; and attention.
65%
Flag icon
concerned with the critical problem of creating order out of parallel spatial displays,
65%
Flag icon
the problem of order.
65%
Flag icon
how do somatic markers function as criteria?
65%
Flag icon
Normal cognition and movement require organization of concurrent and interactive sequences.
66%
Flag icon
biological drives (its reasons, so to speak).
66%
Flag icon
us lucky enough to have been reared in a relatively healthy culture
66%
Flag icon
If we assume that the brain is normal and the culture in which it develops is healthy, the device has been made rational relative to social conventions and ethics. The action of biological drives, body states, and emotions may be an indispensable foundation for rationality.
Larry Marquardt
I am uneq8vocal that they are. However those experiencing compromised biological drives/reasons can and often do function well in the domains in which they are stil 'equipped'
66%
Flag icon
Rationality is probably shaped and modulated by body signals, even as it performs the most sublime distinctions and acts accordingly.
66%
Flag icon
The organism has some reasons that reason must utilize.
66%
Flag icon
What the brain required
66%
Flag icon
the somatic marker encompasses an integral change of body state,
66%
Flag icon
the visceral component seems somewhat more critical than the musculoskeletal in the construction of background and emotional states.
67%
Flag icon
when we generate the somatic state that characterizes a certain emotion,
67%
Flag icon
This, though, seems true: If you do not have a skin conductance response, it does not appear that you ever will have the conscious body state characteristic of an emotion.
67%
Flag icon
patients with frontal lobe damage failed to generate any skin conductance responses whatsoever.
68%
Flag icon
more was missing than just the skin conductance response.
68%
Flag icon
As a whole, the skin conductance response experiments gave us a measurable physiological counterpart to the observable reduction in emotional resonance we had noted in these patients, and to their own perceived reduction in feeling.
Larry Marquardt
It might be salient that changes to skin conductance were triggered by aversive stimuli, not attractive ones. Might a comparison study alter the concluding hypotheses?
69%
Flag icon
What could have been happening
70%
Flag icon
exaggeration of what may be a normal basic tendency, to go for the now rather than bank on the future.
70%
Flag icon
One of the most distinctive human traits is the ability to learn to be guided by future prospects rather than by immediate outcomes,
70%
Flag icon
automated predictions of the significance of a future outcome.
70%
Flag icon
The neural expression of this covert, nonconscious means of reasoning would be the biasing somatic state.
70%
Flag icon
In short, you cannot formulate and use adequate “theories” for your mind and for the mind of others if something like the somatic marker fails you.
70%
Flag icon
PREDICTING THE FUTURE: PHYSIOLOGICAL CORRELATES
70%
Flag icon
skin conductance
Larry Marquardt
Answer to a noted question.
71%
Flag icon
“out of sight and in mind, but never mind.”
Larry Marquardt
Analytically observable?
71%
Flag icon
learning something important about the situation and trying to signal, in anticipatory fashion, what would not be good for the future ahead.
Larry Marquardt
Above and following.
71%
Flag icon
We do not know yet how the prediction for negative future outcome develops in our gambling experiment.
71%
Flag icon
George Lakoff
71%
Flag icon
Mark Johnson,
72%
Flag icon
memory will be a neural record of many of the organismic changes just described,
72%
Flag icon
The organism actively modifies itself so that the interfacing can take place as well as possible.
72%
Flag icon
Perceiving is as much about acting on the environment as it is about receiving signals from it.
72%
Flag icon
the body contributes more than life support and modulatory effects to the brain. It contributes a content
72%
Flag icon
the self is a repeatedly reconstructed biological state;
73%
Flag icon
an early and indispensable story which brain neurons have to tell is the story of the body’s schema and operation. The primacy of the body as a theme applies to evolution: from simple to complex, for millions of years,
73%
Flag icon
a number of assumptions.
73%
Flag icon
images,
Larry Marquardt
Multi-media, as he seems to indicate while employng a word that typically connors visual information.
73%
Flag icon
a highly effective solution: representing the outside world in terms of the modifications it causes in the body proper,
73%
Flag icon
What and where is this primordial representation?
Larry Marquardt
To me, representation as used here seems to connote or imply a sort of holographic reiteration
73%
Flag icon
the skin
74%
Flag icon
In the beginning, there was no touching, or seeing, or hearing, or moving along by itself. There was, rather, a feeling of the body as it touched, or saw, or heard, or moved.
Larry Marquardt
Why would anybody conclude that this ha changed.
75%
Flag icon
George Lakoff, Mark Johnson, Eleanor Rosch, Francisco Varela, and Gerald Edelman.6